期刊文献+

三种根管器械预备弯曲根管的效果比较 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较不锈钢K型锉(K-file)、手动镍钛合金锉(Ni-Ti flex)和机动镍钛锉Profile(PF)预备弯曲根管时,保持原根管解剖走向的能力。方法:选择45个离体下颌单根管前磨牙,弯曲度为20°-45°,随机分为3组,分别用不锈钢K锉(SS-K锉)、手动镍钛器械(Ni-Ti flex)、机动镍钛器械Profile进行根管预备。治疗前后分别拍摄可高度重叠的X线片,通过计算机扫描和放大,分析比较各组之间维持原根管形态的差异,并记录各组的操作时间和器械分离的发生率。结果:镍钛手动器械和机动器械都能较好地保持原根管解剖走向,SS器械所致的根管偏移的数目随器械号数的增大而增加,^#30以上的器械,镍钛组(包括手动和机动)保持根管解剖走向能力与SS组相比有显著差异性(P〈0.05),两镍钛锉之间无显著性差异。机动镍钛组有一器械分离,操作时间机动组比手动组快(P〈0.01)。结论:对于弯曲根管,当根尖部预备大于^#30时,镍钛锉保持根管原解剖走向的能力优于不锈钢锉,机动器械比手动器械操作时间短。
作者 王芳 王忠亮
机构地区 口腔医院
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 2006年第2期98-100,共3页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Schilder H.Cleaning and shaping the root canal[J].Dent Clin North Am,1974,18 (2):269 296
  • 2Weine F.Endodontic therapy[M].St.Louis:CV Mosby,1989.277
  • 3Roane JB,Sabala CL,Duncanson MG Jr.The "balance force"concept for instrumentation of curved canals[J].J Endon,1985,11(5):203 -211
  • 4Schneider SW.A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1971,32(2):271 -275
  • 5Esposito PT,Couningham CJ.A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments[J].J Endod,1995,21 (4):173-176
  • 6Eldeeb M,Boraas JC.The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals[J].Int Endod J,1985,18(1):1 -7
  • 7Schafer E,Lohmann D.Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K -Flexofile-part 1.Shaping ability in simulated curved canals[J].Int Endod J,2002,35(6):505 -513
  • 8Krupp JD,Brantley WA,Gerstein H.An investigation of the torsional and bending properties of seven brands endodontic files[J].J Endod,1984,10(8):372 -380
  • 9Southard DW,Oswald RJ,Natkin E.Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the roane technique[J].J Endod,1987,13(10):479 -489
  • 10陈炯,褚敏,梁景平.两种镍钛机动器械根管预备的比较研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2005,15(4):202-204. 被引量:11

二级参考文献20

  • 1Short JA, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques [ J ]. J Endod, 1997,23 ( 8 ) :503 - 507.
  • 2Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, et al. Mechanical root canal preparation with Niti rotary instruments:rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Denstistry[ J] .Am J Dent,2001,14(5) :324 -333.
  • 3Bramante CM, Berbert A, Borges RP. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentation [ J ]. J Endod, 1987,13 ( 5 ):243 - 245.
  • 4Coleman CL, Svec TA, Rieger MR, et al. Analysis of nickel - titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging [ J ]. J Endod, 1996,22 ( 11 ): 603 - 607.
  • 5Jeon IS,Spangberg LS, Yoon TC, et al. Smear layer production by 3 rotary reamers with different cutting blade designs in straight root canals:A scanning electron microscopic study [ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2003,96( 5 ) :601 -607.
  • 6Gonzalez - Rodriguez MP, Ferrer- Luque CM. A comparison of Profile, Hero 642 and K3 instrumenta6on systems in teeth using digital imaging analysis [ J ]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod ,2004,97 ( 1 ): 112 - 115.
  • 7Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, et al. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high - resolution computed tomography [ J ]. J Endod,2001,27 ( 1 ): 1 - 6.
  • 8Ankrum MT,Hartwell GR,Truitt JE. K3 endo,Protaper,and Profile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars[J]. J Endod,2004,30(4) :234 -237.
  • 9Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel - titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K - flexofiles in simulated curved root canals[ J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2001,92 ( 2 ): 215 - 220.
  • 10Yared GM, Bo Dagher FE, Machtou P. Influence of rotational speed, torque and operator's proficiency on profile failures [ J ].Int Endod J,2001,34( 1 ) :47 -53.

共引文献16

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部