摘要
2003年初出台了《最高人民法院关于审理因虚假陈述引发的民事赔偿案件的若干规定》,将行政为主的程序设置为人民法院审理的强制性前置制度。然而从理论以及现实两个角度来分析,该行政程序前置制度不尽合理,且这一具体制度无论是法理推演,还是现实操作方面都还缺乏应有的合理性。
"The Stipulations of the Supreme People' s Court of the PRC on Adjudicating Civil Compensation Case Involved False Allegation" (2003) sets administrative procedure as a mandatory preceding system for the people' s courts to hear cases, which is however, viewed from theoretical and practical points, not rational. This system lacks in rationality in the aspect of jurisprudential ratiocination and practical execution.
出处
《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第2期28-33,共6页
Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
行政程序
前置制度
行政权
司法权
administrative procedure
preceding system
executive power
judicial power