摘要
在传统法学理论中,财产关系与财产行为关系对立,主体与客体的关系同主体与主体的关系相混淆,并且财产本身有公私之分,这种理论既不能简明法财产的本质,也不能解释现实生活中不同类型的财产。事实上财产的本质是一束权利(权力)义务(职责)关系,不同类型的财产是这种权利(权力)义务(职责)关系的不同组合。并且,只有原生财产才能够进行比较清楚的划分,衍生财产是难以在法律上进行具体的划分的,它具有无限的衍生性。
In the traditional theory of jurisprudence, the property relation and the property act relation are opposite, while the relationship between subjects and objects and the relationship between subjects and subjects are confusing. The property per se is divided into public and private ones, so the theory cannot clarify the nature of legal property and the property of different types in reality. As a matter of fact, the nature of property is a relationship between rights (powers) and obligations (duties). Different types of property are the different combination of such kind of rights(powers) and obligations(duties). Besides, only the original property can be divided clearly, while the derived property is hard to be divided in law, because it has limitless ramification.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第1期160-169,共10页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词
财产悖论
构成关系
基本类型
本质属性
Property Paradox
Constituent Relation
Basic Type
Substantial Attribute