期刊文献+

直肠癌淋巴结转移相关因素的临床探讨 被引量:6

Relevant factors of lymphatic metastasis in rectal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨直肠癌淋巴结转移的规律,为临床治疗提供参考。方法:对1995~2004年手术治疗的979例直肠癌的资料进行分类整理,采用卡方检验及logistic多因素回归分析了解其淋巴结转移与临床病理之间的关系。结果:30岁以下年龄组的淋巴结转移率为71.4%;肿瘤直径大于6cm组的淋巴结转移率为40.7%;肿瘤浸润至浆膜外组的淋巴结转移率为82.5%;低分化腺癌、黏液腺癌、印戒细胞癌组淋巴结转移率分别为71.6%,70.4%,100%;肿瘤侵犯肠管周径大于1/2者淋巴结转移率为46.4%。logistic多因素回归分析表明,相关因素与淋巴结转移的程度依次为:分化程度〉浸润深度〉侵犯肠管周径,分化程度是影响淋巴结转移的最重要因素。结论:直肠癌淋巴结转移与病人年龄、肿瘤大小、侵犯肠管周径、浸润深度和分化程度相关,其中肿瘤的分化程度是影响淋巴结转移的最重要因素。 Objective To investigate the rules of lymphatic metastasis of rectal carcinoma, and to help clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in the 979 patients with rectal carcinoma who underwent surgical resection from 1995 to 2004. The associations between lymphatic metastasis and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated by Chi-squared test and logistic regression. Results The rate of lymph node metstasis was 71.4% for patients younger than 30 years old, 40.7% in the patients with tumor diameters over 6 centimeters, 82.5% in the patients with extraneous tumor invasion, 71.6% for patients of poor-differentiated adenocarcinoma, 70.4% for patients with mucoid adenocarcinoma, 100% for patients with signet-ring cell carcinoma and 46.4% for patients with more than half intestinal circumference invasion. Logistic regression analysis showed that the degree of lymphatic metastasis was related to the differentiating degrees, depths of tumor invasion and intestinal circumference invasion, and the differentiating degree was the major factor. Conclusion The lymphatic metastasis of rectal carcinoma is related to age, tumor size, intestinal circumference invasion, depth of tumor invasion and the differentiating degree of the tumor; the differentiating degree is the major factor.
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期128-130,共3页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
关键词 直肠癌 淋巴结转移 相关性分析 rectal carcinoma lymphatic mestastasis correlation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1蒋会勇,卿三华.大肠癌淋巴结转移相关因素研究现况[J].世界华人消化杂志,1999,7(11):982-984. 被引量:14
  • 2Hojo K,Koyama Y,Moriga Y.Lymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer[J].Am J Surg,1982,141(4):350-354.
  • 3杨海军,张三申,赵卫江,赵成生,成怡玲.大肠癌淋巴结转移的相关病理因素368例分析[J].河南肿瘤学杂志,2000,13(6):403-404. 被引量:7
  • 4Tannapfel A,Kocherling F,Katalinic A,et al.Expression of nm23-H1 predicts lymph node involvement in colorectal carcinoma[J].Dis Colon Rectum,1995,38(6):651.
  • 5Kataoka M,Okabayashi T,Orita K.Decreased expression of DCC mRNA in gastric and colorectal cancer[J].Surg Today,1995,25(12):1001-1007.
  • 6Teixeira CR,Tanaka S,Haruma K,et al.Antigen expression at the invasive tumor margin predicts malignant potential of colorectal carcinomas[J].Cancer,1994,73(3):575-579.
  • 7Myeroff LL,Markowitz SD.Increased nm23-Hland nm23-H2 messenger RNA expression and absence of mutations in colon carcinomas of low and high metastatic potential[J].J Natl Cancer Institute,1993,85(2) 147-152.
  • 8Tanabe KK,Ellis LM,Saya H.Expression of CD44 R1 adhesion molecule in colon carcinomas and metastases[J].Lancet,1993,341(8847):725-726.
  • 9Cohn KH,Ornstein DL,Wang FS,et al.The significance of alle-lic deletions and aneuploidy in colorectal carcinoma:Results of a 5-year follow-up study[J].Cancer,1997,79(2):233-244.

二级参考文献14

共引文献17

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部