唐以前的《史》《汉》比较研究综述

Review of the pre-Tang comparative study of Records of the Historian and Hanshu

唐以前的《史》《汉》比较大都就读书的直观印象肆意评论,往往牵连马班的为人,从评价者的主观爱憎出发,上下其手,一般没有客观且强有力的证据来辅佐论点,所以价值不大。但是由于这部分材料是《史》《汉》比较研究的基础,而且历来谈及这些材料的人不能正本清源,牵扯出很多问题。本文对此进行了辨析与考证。

are random comments on interpretations of the two books without objective and strong proof of their points and thus are of little value. However, these comments are the base for the comparative study of Records of the sistorian and Hanshu, and those who have always talked about the materials couldn＇ t overhaul them, which has given rise to many problems. This paper differentiates, analysizes and criticizes the problems.