期刊文献+

竞争、管制与院校绩效——中国公立高等院校的实证分析 被引量:3

Competition, Regulation and University Performance——An Empirical Analysis of Public University in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构造了竞争、管制与我国公立院校绩效之间的协方差结构模型。结果表明:教育劳务市场竞争有利于提高院校教育绩效,科研市场竞争有利于院校科研绩效提高不能得到证实,校长市场竞争有利于院校绩效改进,政府管制有利于院校绩效提高不能得到证实。提出了改进我国公立院校外部治理机制的几点建议。 This paper presents a structure equation model to examine the relationship between public university performance and competition and regulation in China. The results show that increasing competition in education service market is associated with higher university & college education performance. And increasing competition in R&D market has no positive effect on university & college R&D performance. And the longer president's tenure is associated with the lower university & college performance. And regulation such as universities directed as branches of the central government, or merged by government order, cannot improve their performance. Finally, the significance of competition and regulation for improving public university & college performance in China is discussed
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期86-92,125,共8页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家软科学基金<我国高等教育制度创新的经济学分析>资助项目(ZX2003-21)
关键词 竞争 管制 院校绩效 协方差结构 competition regulation performance covariance structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Bernard Enjolras.Cooperation Failure.Property Rights and Non-Profit Organizations.Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics[J].2000,71(3):347-374
  • 2Peters,L.L..For-Profit And Non-Profit Firms:Limits Of The Simple Theory Of Attenuated Property Rights.Review Of Industrial Organization[J].1993,8(4):623-633
  • 3Pamela Ackroyd,Stephen Ackroyd.Problems Of University Governance In Britain:Is More Accountability The Solution.The International Journal of Public Sector Management[J].1999,12(2):171-185
  • 4Herman,R.D.And Renz,D.O..Board Practices Of Especially Effective And Less Effective Local Non-Profit Organizations.American Review Of Public Administration.[J]2000,3(2):146-160
  • 5菲利普·G·阿特巴赫,蒋凯.高等教育的发展模式[J].现代大学教育,2001(5):58-64. 被引量:23
  • 6于东智.董事会、公司治理与绩效——对中国上市公司的经验分析[J].中国社会科学,2003(3):29-41. 被引量:344
  • 7Catherine M.Daily,Patricia P.McDougall,Jeffrey G.Covin.Governance and Strategic Leadership in Entrepreneurial Firms.Journal of Management[J].2002,28(3):387-412
  • 8Jerilyn W.Coles,Victoria B.McWilliams,Nilanjan Sen.An Examination Of The Relationship Of Governance Mechanisms To Performance[J].Journal of Management.2001,27(1):23-50
  • 9冒荣.高等教育市场的发育与控制初析[J].高等教育研究,1993,14(2):33-37. 被引量:8
  • 10Ase Gornitzka,Peter Maassen.Hybrid Steering Approaches With Respect To European Higher Education.Higher Education Policy[J].2000,13(3):267-285

二级参考文献37

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1721

同被引文献48

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部