期刊文献+

多寡头古诺竞争与斯塔尔博格竞争的对比研究 被引量:29

Comparative Study on Multi-Cournot Competition Model and Multi-Stackelberg Competition Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 对以产量为竞争策略的多寡头古诺竞争与多寡头斯塔尔博格竞争进行对比研究.分析表明,当寡头数目在2与12之间时,古诺利润大于斯塔尔博格后动利润:此时寡头若采取积极的市场进入策略,即便不能获得斯塔尔博格先动优势,但其通过古诺竞争获得的利润依然大于斯塔尔博格后动利润;当寡头数目大于等于13时,古诺利润将小于斯塔尔博格后动利润:此时寡头如果采取积极的市场进入策略,一旦不能获得斯塔尔博格先动优势而导致古诺竞争时,其利润甚至小于作为斯塔尔博格跟随者的后动利润. Muhi-Coumot competition model and Muhi-Stackelberg competition model are studied comparatively, Analysis shows that when the number of oligopoly firms is between 2 and 12, the profit in muhi-Cournot competition would be higher than the profit of followers in muhi-Stackelberg competition. If oligarch adopts active competition strategy, it would obtain higher profit through multi-Cournot competition, even it loses the chance to be the leader in multi-Stackelberg competition. When the number of oligopoly firms is equal or higher than 13, the profit in multi- Coumot competition would be lower than the profit of followers in muhi-Stackelberg competition. If oligarch adopts active competition strategy, it would obtain lower profit through multi-Coumot competition , while loses the chance to be the leader in multi-Stackelberg competition.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第2期49-54,共6页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70172001)
关键词 寡头 古诺竞争 斯塔尔博格竞争 oligopoly Cournot competition Stackelberg competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Cournot A A.Recherches sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses[M].In Libraire de Sciences Politiques et Sociale.M.Riviere & Cie,Paris,1838.
  • 2Von Stackelberg H.Marktform und Gleichgewicht[M].Vienna and Berlin:Julius Springer Verlag,1934.
  • 3Gal-Or E.First mover and second mover advantages[J].International Economic Review,1985,26(3):649-653.
  • 4Dowrick S.Von Stackelberg and Comnot duopoly:Choosing roles[J].Rand Journal of Economics,1986,17(2):251-260.
  • 5Muceller D.First mover advantages and path dependence[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization,1997,15(6):827 -850.
  • 6VanderWerf P,Mahon J.Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of first-mover advantage[J].Management Science,1997,43(11):1510-1519.
  • 7Haan M,Marks H.Stackelberg and Cournot competition under equilibrium limit pricing[J].Journal of Economic Studies,1996,23(5/6):110-127.
  • 8Okuguchi K.Cournot and Stackelberg duopolies revisited[J].The Japanese Economic Review,1999,50(3):363-367.
  • 9Rassenti S,Reynolds S,Smith V,Szidarovszky F.Adaptation and convergence of behavior in repeated experimental Cournot games[J].Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2000,41(2):117-146.
  • 10Matsumura T.Cournot dupoly with multi-period competition:Inventory as a coordination device[J].Australian Economic Papers,1999,38(3):189-202.

同被引文献223

引证文献29

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部