3Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radial, 1989, 24: 234-245.
4Sirio CA, Tajimi K, Knaus WA, et aL An initial comparison of intensive care in Japan and the United States. Crit Care Med, 1992,20: 1207-1215.
5Rowan KM, Kerr JH, Major E, et aL Intensive Care Society' s APACHE H Study in Britain and Ireland Ⅱ : outcome comparison of intensive care units after adjustment for care mix by the American APACHEII method. BMJ, 1993, 307: 977-981.
6Oh TE, Hutchinson R, Short S, et al. Verification of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 1993, 21 : 698.
7Cho DY, Wang YC. Comparison of the APACHE Ⅲ, APACHE Ⅱ and Glasgow Come Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome. Intensive Care Med, 1997, 23 :77-84.
11，Castslla X，Antigsa，BionJ，et al ．A comparison of severity of illne ss scoring systems for intensive c are unitpatients：results of multi center，multinational study，The Eur opean／North Americanseverity grou p．Crit Care Med，1995，23（8）：1327-1335
2中华神经科学会.中华神经外科学会[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-379.
33，Knaus WA，Zimmerman JE，Wagner DP ，et al．APACHE Ⅱ：a severity of dise aseclassification system．Crit Car e Med，1985，13（10）：818
44，Wilson C，Health DI，Imrie CW．Pred iction of outcome in acute pancrea titis：acomparative study of APACH E Ⅱ：clinical assessment and multip le factor scoringsystems．Br J Sur g，1990，77（11）：1260-1264
55，Chang RW，Lee B，Jacobs S．Accuracy of decisions to withdraw therapy i n criticallyill patients：clinical judgement versus a computer model． Crit Care Med，1989，17：1091-1097
