摘要
傅斯年,朱希祖,朱谦之均与北京大学、中山大学有紧密的关系。在北京大学期间,朱希祖是北京大学的著名教授、系主任,傅斯年和朱谦之则是北京大学非常出名的学生。以后,傅斯年、朱谦之、朱希祖先后到中山大学任教,都对中山大学史学系有所贡献。三人当中,二朱在中山大学曾是同事。朱谦之对傅斯年的学术思想有较多的评论,认为傅斯年是“发展式的历史”的第三阶段的第二小阶段的代表人物,既指出了他比文献考证派的优胜之处,又指出了他的局限性。朱希祖与傅斯年在明成祖生母问题上有过争论。这些评论和争鸣,既表现出他们各自深厚的学术功底和严谨的治学态度,也反映出近代学人错综复杂的学术关系。
Fu Sinian ZhuXizu and Zhu Qianzhi all have close relations to Zhongshan University. During Beijing department, Fu Sinian and Zhu University, Zhu Xizu was a famous professor Qianzhi Beijing University and and the dean of history were very outstanding students. Afterwards, Fu Sinian Zhu Qianzhi Zhu Xizu went to Zhong Shan University successively, and contributed a lot for Zhong Shan University. Zhu Xizu and Zhu Qianzhi worked together at that time, and what is more, Zhu Qianzhi made some remarks on Fu Sinian, regarded him as representative figure of history field, and pointed out Fu' s advantage and weakness as well. Zhu Xizu argued with Fu Sinian on the issue that who is the mother of Emperor Ming Cheng Zu. These remarks and debates displayed their intricate academic relations as well as their profound knowledge and rigorous scientific approach.
出处
《史学史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第1期12-19,共8页
Journal of Historiography
关键词
傅斯年
朱希租
朱谦之
学术关系
Fu Sinian Zhu Xizu Zhu Qianzhi academic relation