3Merx W, Hall J, Yoon MS, et al. Effects of unipolar cathodal and bipolar stimulation on vulnerability of ischemic ventricles to fibrilla- tion. Am J Cardiol JT - The American jour- nal of cardiology, 1975,35 ( 1 ) :37 - 41.
5Wiegand UK, Potratz J, Luninghake F, et al. Electmphysiological characteristics of bi- polar membrane carbon leads with and with- out steroid elution compared with a conven- tional carbon and a steroid - during platinum lead. PACE, 1996,19(8) :1155.
6Kay GN, Epstein AE, Plumb VJ, et al. Comparison of unipolar and bipolar active fix- ation atrial pacing leads. PACE, 1988, 11 (5) :544 -9.
7Comaechia D, Fabbri M, Puglisi A, et al. Latest generation of unipolar and bipolar ster- oid eluting leads: long - term comparison of electrical performance in atrium and ventri- cles. Europace, 2000,2(3) :240.
8Schuchert A, Meinertz T. Acute effects of a class IA antiarrbythmic drug on the ventricu- lar evoked response amplitude in patients with cardiac pacemakers. Cardiology, 2000, 94 : 103 - 105.
9Breivik K, Ohm OJ, Engedal H, et al. Long - term comparison of unipolar and bipolar pacing and sensing, using a new multipro- grammable pacemaker system. PACE, 1983,6(3 Pt 1) :592.
10Nielsen AP, Cashion Wit, Spencer WH, et ul. Long - term assessment of unipolar and bipolar stimulation and sensing thresholds u- sing a lead configuration programmable pace- maker. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 , 5 (5) :1198.
