期刊文献+

语言批判视阈中的话语旨趣及批判原则

The Discursive Interests and Critical Tenets of Linguistic Critique
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言批判的理念沿袭及现实关怀,深刻隐蕴了历史范畴中人们对话语生成、生产、操纵及变节的多元化多学科多向度认识,而话语本身的社会性、辩证性、革命性和论证性也客观上预设和厘定了语言批判该有的批判对象、批判旨趣、批判方式等原则性取向,这些都表征了语言本真意义追寻中的心路历程和认知印迹。同时,对社会现象进行批判性话语研究,能够把我们的思维带入由生活世界构建的意义视域。 The notional evolution and realistic solicitude of linguistic critique is metaphorically pregnant with the pluralistic, multidisciplinary and multidimensional concepts of discourse in the minds of the philosophers, whereas the societal, dialectical, revolutionary and argumentational qualities of discourse have presupposed and determined the principium orientation of its critical objectives, critical interests and critical methodologies, which represents the inner course and cognitive footprints in the pursuit of the truth of language. Meanwhile, a critical disocourse study of social phenomena can bring our mentality into the horizon of Meaning which is constituted and constructed by lifeworld.
作者 胡云飞
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期26-31,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 语言批判 话语 社会 现实关怀 linguistic critique discourse society realistic solicitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Fairelough, N. Discourse and Social Change[ M]. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1992.65,96 - 99
  • 2Frieddrich Nietzsche, Samtliche Werke Kritisehe Stutilenausbabe Bd 1 [ M ]. Munchen: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag,1980. 455.
  • 3本雅明.论语言本身和人的语言[A].陈永国等译.本雅明文选[C].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999..
  • 4约翰逊.海德格尔[M].北京:中华书局,2002.89.
  • 5Kockelmans. Josh J. On Heidegger and Language[ M]. Eraston, 1972. 29.
  • 6Gadamer. Philosophical Hermeneutics [ M ]. Trans. David E L. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.68.
  • 7伽达默尔 洪汉鼎(译).真理与方法[M].上海译文出版社,1999,4..
  • 8Foucauh, M. The History of Sexuality[M]. New York:Random House, 1978.20,
  • 9Habermas J. Theory of Communicative Action vol. 2 Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functional Reason [M],London: Heinemann, 1987. 124.
  • 10Fairelough N. Discourse, Social Theory, and Social Research:The Discourse of Welfare Reform[J]. Soeiolinguistles,2000(2) :163 - 195.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Chouliaraki, L & N Fairclough. Discourse in Late Modernity [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
  • 2Andrews, R. Teaching and Learning Argument [M]. London: Cassell, 1995.
  • 3Habermas, J. Theory of Communicative Action vol.1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society[M]. London: Heinemann, 1986.
  • 4Toulmin, S E, Rieke, R & A Janik. An Introduction to Reasoning [M]. New York:Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc, 1979.
  • 5Bakhtin, M. The Dialogic Imagination [M]. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
  • 6Austin, J L. How to Do Things with Words [M].Oxford. OUP, 1962.
  • 7Foucault, M. The Foucault Reader [C]. P Rabinow (ed). London: Penguin, 1984.
  • 8Bhaskar, R. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation [M]. London: Verso, 1986.
  • 9Martin, J R. Grammar Meets Genre: Reflections on the 'Sydney School' Inaugural Lecture [Z]. Sydney University Arts Association, 2000.
  • 10Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change [M] Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部