期刊文献+

基于贝叶斯的多议题协商优化 被引量:2

An Integrated-Utility Based Bayesian in Multi-Issues Negotiation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在限时条件下的Agent之间的多议题协商中,虽然最差的结果是没有达成协定,而达成了一个使自己潜在利益受损的协定未必就是好的选择。在很多情况下,由于推理策略和交互机制的不完善使得Agent个体失去自己应得的利益。论文使用贝叶斯方法对协商对手进行预测,尽量使自己的初始信念准确反映对手的意识形态;并在此基础之上提出了一个优化的协商交互模型。在此模型中,Agent个体充分利用自己的预测结果,在协商成功的基础上获得尽可能多的利益。 In time-limited multi-issues negotiation among multi-Agents,although the worst result is no trade-off,but a result which lost its profit is not a good choose.In many case,the Agent lost the profit because the illation strategy and negotiation mechanism are not perfect.This paper forecasts opponent's belief,and then gets an optimized negotiation model.In this model,the Agent makes use of the forecast to get more profit based on negotiation.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期69-71,共3页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 河南省自然科学基金资助项目(编号:0211050110)
关键词 多议题 协商 贝叶斯 效用 multi-issues, negotiation, Bayesian, utility
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1李静,陈兆乾,陈世福,徐殿祥.多Agent Teamwork研究综述[J].计算机研究与发展,2003,40(3):422-429. 被引量:14
  • 2Jennings N R,Faratin P,Lomuscio A R et al.Automated negotiation:Prospects,methods and challenges[J].International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation,2001;10(2):199~215
  • 3Sandholm T W,Zhou Y H.Surplus equivalence of leveled commitment contracts[J].Artificial Intelligence,2002;142(2):239~264
  • 4Braynov S,Sandholm T.Contracting with uncertain level of trust[J].Computational Intelligence,2002;18(4):501~514
  • 5Zeng D J,Sycara K.Bayesian learning in negotiation[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,1998;48(1):125~141
  • 6Fatima S,Wooldridge M,Jennings N R.Multi-Issue negotiation under time constraints[C].In:Castelfranchi C,Johnson WL eds.Proc of the 1st Int'l Joint Conf on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems(AAMAS 2002),Bologna:ACM Press,2002:143~ 150
  • 7郭庆,陈纯.基于整合效用的多议题协商优化[J].软件学报,2004,15(5):706-711. 被引量:27

二级参考文献24

  • 1[美]NilsJNilsson著 郑扣根译.人工智能[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000.3-46.
  • 2J Yen, J Yin, T R Ioerger et al. CAST: Collaborative agents for simulating teamwork. The Seventeenth Int'l Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI-01), Seattle, WA, 2001
  • 3L E Parker. ALLIANCE: An architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperation. IEEE Trans on Robotics and Automation, 1998, 14(2): 220~240
  • 4J Yin, M S Miller, T R Ioerger et al. A knowledge-based approach for designing intelligent team training systems. The Fourth Int'l Conf on Autonomous Agents(Agents 2000), Barcelona, Spain, 2000
  • 5G A Kaminka, M Tambe. Robust agent teams via socially-attentive monitoring. Journal of Aritificial Intelligence Research, 2002, 12: 105~147
  • 6P R Cohen, H J Levesque. Teamwork. Special Issue on Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 25(4): 487~512
  • 7B Grosz, S Kraus. Collaborative plans for complex group actions. Artificial Intelligence, 1996, 86: 269~358
  • 8J E Laird. Building intelligent synethetic characters for computer games. University of Michigan, Tech Rep, 2001
  • 9H June, M Tambe, S Kulkarni. Argumentation as distributed constraint satisfaction: Applications and results. The 5th Int'l Conf on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, Canada, 2001
  • 10M Tambe, W Zhang. Towards flexible teamwork in persistent teams: Extended report. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2000, 3(2): 159~183

共引文献39

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部