期刊文献+

核武器与美国对朝鲜战争的政策 被引量:14

Nuclear Weapons and the United States Policy with regard to the Korean War
原文传递
导出
摘要 朝鲜战争时期,美国政府借助核优势,对中朝方面几次发出核威胁,力图改变战场上的不利局面,实现有利于自己的和平。美国的核威慑不仅没有改变战场上的局面,也未能挽回美国的败局,却使自己陷入进退两难的尴尬境地。由于受到国内、国际诸多因素的制约,美国在使用核武器方面不能不有所顾忌。最终,只能通过谈判解决问题。所谓美国的“核威慑”导致了朝鲜停战不过是美国决策者自欺欺人的一个“神话”而已。朝鲜战争再次表明了核威慑的限度。 During the Korean War, the US government used of its nuclear advantage to threaten China and Korea with nuclear weapons in an effort to reverse its inferior position in the war and seek a peace in its favor. However, its nuclear threats failed to change the situation on the field of battle and could not keep the US from losing the war. On the contrary, the effort only dragged the US into an awkward dilemma with no easy way out. Faced with a number of domestic and international constraints on the use of nuclear weapons, the US could not but have misgivings, and ended up having to resolve the issue through negotiation. The idea that the US nuclear threat brought about the cease-fire in Korea is nothing more than a myth invented by the US decision-makers to deceive the world and themselves. The Korean War provides yet another proof of the limited effects of the nuclear threat.
作者 赵学功
出处 《历史研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第1期136-156,共21页 Historical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献150

  • 1John L. Gaddis, The Long Peace: Inquiries Into the History of the Cold War, New York: Oxford University Press, 1987, p, 120
  • 2McGeorge Bundy, Danger and Survival: Choices about the Bomb in the First Fifty Years, New York: Random House, 1988, pp. 335 -336
  • 3Alexander George and Richard Smoke, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy x Theory and Practice, New York: Columbia University Press, 1974, pp, 238-239
  • 4Bernard Brodie, War and Politics, London: The Macmillan Press, 1973,p. 105
  • 5Sherman Adams, Firsthand Report : The Story of the Eisenhower Administration, New York:Harper and Brothers, 1961, pp. 48-49.
  • 6Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS) , 1950, vol. 7, Washington, D. C. Government Printing Office, 1976, p. 159.
  • 7FRUS, 1950, vol. 1, Washington, D. C. Government Printing Office, 1977, p. 328.
  • 8National Security Council (NSC) 76, "U. S. Courses of Action in the Event of Soviet Forces Enter Korean Hostilities," 21 July 1950
  • 9NSC73/4, "The Position and Actions of the United States with Respect to Possible Further Soviet Moves in the Light of the Korean Situation," 25 August 1950, Record Group(RG) 273, National Archives, College Park, Md.
  • 10Roger Dingman, "Atomic Diplomacy During the Korean War," International Security, vol. 13, no. 3,Winter 1988/89, pp. 57-58.

共引文献91

同被引文献635

引证文献14

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部