期刊文献+

论人性假设理论与团队管理 被引量:4

On Human Nature Hypothesis and Team Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对西方管理思想史上对人性探索的历史回顾,以及对近些年来盛行的工作团队的介绍,可以看出团队对员工人性方面的充分发挥有积极的一面,但同时也存在着问题。以往的人性假设理论只注重个体的需要以及积极性的提高,没有把人放在群体中去研究,忽视了人与人之间的相互作用对生产的影响。因此,我们需要对工作中的人性进行全面的重新探讨,形成新的人性假设,以促使管理理论、管理思想和管理制度等发生相应的改变。 By reviewing the exploration of human nature in ideology of western management in history and introducing the popular work teams in recent years, the author of the paper finds that though work teams are positive for the menifestation of human nature of the working staff, they have problems. Human nature hypothesis just pays attention to the individual need and increase of enthusiasm, but fails to study human beings in groups, thus neglects the influence of interpersonal interaction, Therefore, we should explore human nature comprehensively and form new human nature hypothesis so as to promote the change in theory, ideology, and system of management.
出处 《商丘师范学院学报》 CAS 2006年第1期130-132,共3页 Journal of Shangqiu Normal University
关键词 人性 工作团队 创新 human nature work teams innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献17

  • 1程胜林.试论知识经济下的管理创新[J].江西社会科学,2001,21(10):97-100. 被引量:24
  • 2世澎.从物本到人本到能本[N].参考消息,2001年4月30日.
  • 3[1]Caroline A Bartel, Richard Saavedra. The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly Ithaca Jun 2000.
  • 4[2]Graham Sewell. The disdpline of teams: The control of team-based industrial work through electronic and peer surveillance. Administrative Science Quarterly Ithaca Jun 1998.
  • 5[3]Gerben van der Vegt,Ben Emans,vert van de Vliert.Motivating Effects of Task and Outcome Interdependence in Work Teams. Group & Organization Management Thousand Oaks Jun 1998.
  • 6[4]Hambrick, Donald C Cho, Theresa Seung Chen,
  • 7[5]Ming-Jer. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves Administrative Science Quarterly Ithaca Dec 1996.
  • 8[6]Jehn, Karen A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly Ithaca Jun 1995.
  • 9[7]Lisa Hope Pelled,Kathleen M Eisenhardt,Katherine R Xin. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work groupdiversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly Ithaca Mar 1999.
  • 10[8]Karen A Jehn. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly Ithaca Sep 1997.

共引文献124

同被引文献27

  • 1赵伟,韩文秀,罗永泰.基于激励理论的团队机制设计[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),1999,1(4):295-298. 被引量:16
  • 2万斌,王满荣.论冲突与和谐[J].求索,2006(8):59-62. 被引量:12
  • 3李丹福 包德坚.关于组织冲突管理的问题[J].华东经济管理,1995,(1).
  • 4Alchian A, Demsetz H. Production, information costs and economic organization[ J]. American Economic Review, 1972, 62 (50) : 777-795.
  • 5Itoh H. Incentives to help in multi-agent situations [ J ]. Econometrica, 1991, 59: 611-636.
  • 6Holmstr~m. Moral hazard in teams [ J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1982, 13(1): 324-340.
  • 7Rasmusen E. Moral hazard in risk-averse teams [ J ].Rand Journal of Economics, 1987, 18(3) : 428-435.
  • 8McAfee R P, McMillan J. Optimal contracts for teams[J]. International Economic Review, 1991, 32: 561-577.
  • 9Lazear E P, Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts [ J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 89: 841-564.
  • 10Green J R, Stokey N L. A comparison of tournaments and contracts[ J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1983, 91 : 349-364.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部