期刊文献+

社会正义理论:豪尔绍尼与罗尔斯的比较 被引量:3

The Theory of Social Justice: A Comparison between Harsanyi and Rawls
下载PDF
导出
摘要 两种最重要的社会正义观念———功利主义和平等主义之间有着紧密的关联。对它们的形式刻画的研究表明,其区别主要来自对偏好的人际间比较的不同假设;在实证基础上,它们对理性决策的预设也有着本质不同,特别是在不确定性情形下的信念方面。从高阶理论的角度看,区分局部适用场合是解决这两种观念在社会实践中冲突的合理途径,但其可行性不应被高估。 Two most important concepts of social justice, that is, utilitarianism and dictionary minimum rule, are closely related. A study of their form description reveals that their differences are the different hypotheses concerning the selected interpersonal comparison. At the positivistic level, they have basic differences concerning the pre-suppositions of rational decision, especially when uncertain beliefs are involved. From the per spective of the upper echelons theory, a distinction of their suitable application in a certain field is a reasonable solution to their conflicts in social practice but its feasibility should not be over-estimated.
作者 丁利
出处 《思想战线》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期14-20,共7页 Thinking
关键词 社会正义 功利主义 字典式最小规则 公理刻画 social justice utilitarianism dictionary minimum rule axiom description
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Kenneth J.Arrow.Social choice and individual value[C].Weiley press corporation,1951,1963.
  • 2Amartya Sen.Collective choice and social welfare[M].Amsterdam:North Holland Press,1970.
  • 3John Harsanyi.Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk taking[C].JPE 61,434-435,1853.
  • 4John Harsanyi.Cardinal welfare,individualistic ethics,and interpersonal comparisons of utility[C].JPE63,309 -321,1955.
  • 5Dennis C.Mueller.Public choice Ⅲ.[M] Cambridge University Press,2003.
  • 6John Rawls.A theory of justice[C].Harvard University Press Cambridge,MA,1971.
  • 7John Rawls.Outline of a decision procedure for ethics[C].Philosophical Review vol.60 no.2,177-197,1951.
  • 8John Harsanyi.Morality and the theory of rational behavior[A].Social Research vol.44 no.4,reprinted in Amartya Sen & Bernard Williams (eds.).Utilitarianism and beyond[M].Cambridge University Press,39-62,1991.
  • 9John Harsanyi.Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1977.
  • 10John Rawls.Some reasons for the maximin criterion,[C].American Economic Review LXIV (2),141 -146,1974.

同被引文献20

  • 1[英]亚当·斯密.《道德情操论》,第97-98页,蒋自强等译,北京,商务印书馆,1997.
  • 2姚洋,2007."论能力指向的平等",北京大学中国经济研究中心内部讨论稿,No.C2007010.
  • 3[印度]阿玛蒂亚·森,2006.《论经济不平等·不平等之再考察》,北京:社会科学文献出版社.
  • 4Friedman, Milton, 1953. "Choice, Chance, and the Personal Distribution of Income. "Journal of Political Economy. 61:277 -90.
  • 5Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer,Joe A. and Eavey, Cheryl L. , 1987. " Laboratory Results on Rawls~ Distributive Justice. "British Journal of Political Science. 17 ( 1 ) : 1 - 21.
  • 6Harsanyi, 1953. "Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking. "Journal of Political Economy. 61:434 - 35.
  • 7Kroll, Yoram and Davidovitz, Liema ,2003. "Inequality Aversion Versus Risk Aversion. "Economica. 70 : 19 - 29.
  • 8Traub, Stefan, Seidl, Christian and Schmidt, Ulrich, 2008. " An Experimental Study on Individual Choice, Social Welfare,and Social Preferences. "European Economic Review. www. elsevier, com/locate/eer.
  • 9Traub, Stefan, Seidl, Christian, Schmidt, Ulrich and Levati, MariaVittoria, 2005. " Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boalding or Somebody Else? An Experimental Investigation of Distributive Justice. "Social Choice and Welfare. 24 : 283 - 309.
  • 10Vignemont, Frederique de and Singer, Tania,2006. "The Empathic Brain : How, When and Why?" Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10(10) :435 -41.

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部