孔广森与何休的经学之异

The Different Views on Confucian Classics between KongGuangsen and He Xiu

孔广森被有的学者视为清代第一位有《公羊》学著述的人物,但他的《公羊春秋经传通义》与何休的《公羊》学存在较大的差异,主要之异就在于孔广森否定何休的王鲁说,自立三科九旨,没有对《公羊》学微言的阐发,只有《公羊》书法、大义的发明,从而使孔广森的经学著作虽以《公羊》命名,却对清代《公羊》学的发展没有实质性的推进。然而,孔广森的经学还是有其新内容,并具有一定的历史意义。

It is thought by some scholars that Kong Guangsen is the first one in Qing Dynasty who wrote something related to Gongyang. However, there is a great difference between his＂General explanations to Gongyang＂and HeXiu＇s Gongyang. The main difference lies in that Kong Guangsen denied HeXiu＇s Wanglushuo, which means how to be a wise king through the history of Kingdom Lu, and he set up SankeJiuzhi himself. Instead of explaining Sublime Words. he only explained the Rule of Writing and Profound Meaning. Even though his classic is titled Gongyang, his work did little in promoting the development of Gongyang. Yet there is still something new in Kong Guangsen＇s classic, which has certain historical meaning.