4Ichiro M, Susumu F, Junichi T, et al. Significance of late redistrbution thallium - 201 imaging after rest injection for detection of viable myocardium. J Nucl Med, 1997; 38:10731078.
5Leonardo P, Pasquale PF, Pierpaolo M, et al. Identification of viable mocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease using rest - redistribution thallium - 201 tomography: optimal image analysis. J Nucl Med, 1998;39:1869-1874.
6Roberto S, Giovanni MS, Gianni B, et al. Rest - redistribution thallium - 201 SPECT to detect myocardial viability. J Nucl Med, 1998;39:384-390.
7Kula M, Tutus A, Abaci A, et al. Comparison between rest technetium - 99m - tetrofosmin and rest - redistribution thallium - 201 SPECT in stable patients with healed myocardial infarction. Nucl Med Comm,2001 ;22:1317- 1324.
8Matsuno K, Kuwabara Y, Watanabe S, et al. Detection of myocardial viability using rest - redistribution thallium - 201imaging in a stress ^99Tc^m - tetrofosmin/rest thallium - 201 dual-isotope protocol. Nucl Med Comm, 2001; 22 :165 -173.
9Sharir T, Danid S, Berman, et al. Incremental Prognostic Value of Rest - Redistribution 201^T1 Single - Photon Emission Computed Tomography. Circulation, 1999; 100:1964- 1970.
10Robert W, Morse D, Susan N, et al. Rest - redistribution ^201T1 single- photon emission CT imaging for determination of myocardial viabiliti. Chest, 1999,115 : 1621- 1626.
