期刊文献+

信息共享程度对物流外包激励契约的影响 被引量:15

Affections of Information Sharing for Incentive Contracts in Logistics Outsourcing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文分析了由供应商、制造商和第三方物流企业(3PLs)组成的物流外包系统,考虑了供应商和制造商信息共享程度的影响,建立了协同工作环境下的激励契约模型。结果表明,委托人偏好低努力水平时,信息共享对激励契约没有影响;委托人偏好高努力水平时,信息共享能更好的激励代理人选择委托人希望的行动。信息不共享时,3PLs只有提高对供应商努力水平的积极性;信息共享时,3PLs收入波动性增大,提高对供应商和对制造商的努力水平都能使其获得帕累托改进。本研究为物流成本在供应链成员中的分摊提供了理论依据,并提出了模型改进和研究建议。 This paper analyzes, a logistics outsourcing system which coasists of a supplier, a manufacturer and a third- party logistics supplier (3PLs). Based on coordination work, an incentive contract model is presented, while the affections of information sharing are considered. When the principal prefers the higher efforts, information sharing could create more chance for the principal to acquire more private information to monitor actions of the 3PLs. It encourages the 3PLs to work in principal's interest. The paper ends with a discussion of improvement of the model and directions for future research.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 2006年第1期100-105,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70271030)
关键词 供应链 信息共享 物流外包 激励契约 supply chain information sharing logistics outsourcing incentive contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献32

  • 1.GB/T 18354—2001物流术语[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2001..
  • 2让-雅克·拉丰 大卫·马赫蒂(法) 陈志俊 李艳 单萍萍(译).激励理论(第一卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 3同济大学数学教研室.高等数学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1994..
  • 4S H Ghodsypour, C O' Brien. The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing,multiple criteria and capacity constraint [ J ]. International Journal of Production Economics. 2001,70( 1 ) : 15 - 27.
  • 5Lieb, R C Randall, H L. A comparison of the use of third party logistics services by large American manufacturers[ J ]. Journal of Business Logistics, 1996,17 ( 1 ) : 305 - 320.
  • 6Wei Shi Lim. A lemons market? An incentive scheme to induce truth- telling in third party logistics providers[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2000( 125):519- 525.
  • 7Bernheim, B. D. , and Whinston, M. D.. Common Marketing Agency as a Device for Facilitating Collusion[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1985, 16(2).
  • 8Bernheim, B. D. , and Whinston, NL D.. Common Agency[J].Econometrica, 1986, 54(4): 923-942.
  • 9Gal-or, E.. A Common Agency with Incomplete Information[J].The Rand Journal of Economics, 1991, 22(2): 274-286.
  • 10Mezzetti, C.. Common Agency "with Horizontally Differentiated Principals[J].The Rand Journal of Economics, 1997,28(2): 323-345.

共引文献163

同被引文献150

引证文献15

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部