期刊文献+

蛛网膜下腔—硬膜外联合阻滞分娩镇痛(CSEA)对产程及新生儿影响的研究 被引量:6

The investigation of birth process and newborn condition by combined subarachnoid and epidural analgesia during Labor.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨蛛网膜下腔———硬膜外联合阻滞分娩镇痛(CSEA)对产程及新生儿出生并发症的影响。方法对55例初产妇实施蛛网膜下腔———硬膜外联合阻滞分娩镇痛(CSEA),选择同时期分娩的55例初产妇及其新生儿作为对照组。对两组的产程、剖宫产率以及新生儿窒息、吸入性肺炎、颅内出血等出生并发症的发生率进行对照。结果产程时间镇痛组较对照组短,有显著性差异(P<0.05);剖宫产率镇痛组较对照组低,有显著性差异(P<0.05);新生儿出生并发症发生率两组相同,无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论蛛网膜下腔———硬膜外联合阻滞分娩镇痛(CSEA)效果显著、安全可靠,可缩短产程,降低因社会因素导致的剖宫产率,对新生儿出生并发症发生率无明显影响。 Objective: To investigate the effects of birth process and newborn by combined subarachnoid and epidural analgesia (CSEA). Methods: 55 cases of first pregnant women were administered, combined with CSEA, compared with another 55 control first pregnant women who did not receive CSEA and their newborn, the birth process, incidence of caearean section and neonatal asphyxia, aspiration pneumonia, intracranial hemorrhage and so on. Results: The difference was effectively significant in the birth process and incidence of caesarean section ( P 〈 0. 05 ) between the study group and the control group while there was no significant difference in the incidence of birth complication ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion: The application of CSEA was safe and effective. The birth process was shortened and the incidence of caesarean section caused by social factors was decreased. CSEA was no obvious effects to birth complication.
出处 《中国优生与遗传杂志》 2006年第3期77-78,共2页 Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
关键词 分娩镇痛 蛛网膜下腔——硬膜外联合阻滞(CSEA) 新生儿 Labor analgesia Combined subarachnoid and epidural analgesia (CSEA) Newborn
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

  • 1李莪,翁梨驹.盐酸二氢埃托啡及曲马多用于产时镇痛及对新生儿血气的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,1995,30(6):345-348. 被引量:15
  • 2于习文.连续硬膜外腔阻滞在分娩镇痛中的应用[J].实用妇产科杂志,1995,11(5):248-249. 被引量:27
  • 3邹武,毕敏.硬膜外阻滞分娩镇痛对子宫收缩力的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,1996,12(2):92-93. 被引量:14
  • 4[1]Knudsen K, Surkula MB, Blomberg S, et al. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects during iv infusions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in volunteers[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997,78:507-514.
  • 5[2]Bernard JM, LeRouv D, Vizquel L, Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: The effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval [J]. Anesth Analg, 2000, 90(2):328- 332.
  • 6[3]Carstiniu J, Lerytam S, Norman P, et al. Nitrous oxide in early labor safety and analgesic efficacy assessed by a double and placebo controlled study [J]. Anesthesiology, 1996, 80:30 -35.
  • 7[4]Rosen MA. Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: A systematic review [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002,186(2) :S110 - 126.
  • 8[5]Garc MM, Laez VJ, Sevilapma B, et al. Analgesic effectiveness and fentanyl in continous perfusion[J]. Rev Esp Anesthesiol, 1997,44:135 - 139.
  • 9[6]Vallejo MC, Firestone LL, Mandell Gl, et al. Effect of epidural analgesia with ambulation on labor duration [J ]. Anesthesiology, 2001,95(4) :857 - 861.
  • 10[7]Polley LS, Columb MO. Comparison of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combination with sufentanil for labor[J].Anesthesiology, 2000,92 : 280 - 281.

共引文献56

同被引文献53

引证文献6

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部