期刊文献+

Cross-Reference Benchmarks for Translating the Genetic Soil Classification of China into the Chinese Soil Taxonomy 被引量:21

Cross-Reference Benchmarks for Translating the Genetic Soil Classification of China into the Chinese Soil Taxonomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Soil classification is the foundation for exchange and extension of research findings in soil science and for modern management of soil resources. This study explained database and research methodology to create a cross-reference system for translating the Genetic Soil Classification of China (GSCC) into the Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST). With the help of the CST keys, each of the 2 540 soil species in GSCC has been interpreted to its corresponding soil order, suborder, great group, and sub-group in CST. According to the methodology adopted, the assigned soil species have been linked one another to their corresponding polygons in the 1:1000000 digital soil map of China. Referencibility of each soil species between the GSCC and CST systems was determined statistically on the basis of distribution area of each soil species at a high taxon level of the two systems. The soils were then sorted according to their maximum referencibility and classified into three categories for discussion. There were 19 soil great groups in GSCC with maximum referencibility > 90% and 22 great groups between 60%-90%. These soil great groups could serve as cross-reference benchmarks. There were 19 great groups in GSCC with maximum referencibility < 60%, which could be used as cross-reference benchmarks until new and better results were available. For these soils, if the translation was made at a lower soil taxon level or on a regional basis, it would improve their referencibility enabling them to serve as new cross-reference benchmarks. Soil classification is the foundation for exchange and extension of research findings in soil science and for modern management of soil resources. This study explained database and research methodology to create a cross-reference system for translating the Genetic Soil Classification of China (GSCC) into the Chinese Soil Taxonomy (CST). With the help of the CST keys, each of the 2 540 soil species in GSCC has been interpreted to its corresponding soil order, suborder, great group, and sub-group in CST. According to the methodology adopted, the assigned soil species have been linked one another to their corresponding polygons in the 1:1000 000 digital soil map of China. Referencibility of each soil species between the GSCC and CST systems was determined statistically on the basis of distribution area of each soil species at a high taxon level of the two systems. The soils were then sorted according to their maximum referencibility and classified into three categories for discussion. There were 19 soil great groups in GSCC with maximum referencibility 〉 90% and 22 great groups between 60%-90%. These soil great groups could serve as cross-reference benchmarks. There were 19 great groups in GSCC with maximum referencibility 〈 60%, which could be used as cross-reference benchmarks until new and better results were available. For these soils, if the translation was made at a lower soil taxon level or on a regional basis, it would improve their referencibility enabling them to serve as new cross-reference benchmarks.
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第2期147-153,共7页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40471081)the Frontal Field Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. ISSASIP0201) the Key Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.KZCX3-SW-427).
关键词 中国 土壤图 基准 地图编制 土壤分级 土壤调查 1:1 000 000 soil map of China, cross-reference benchmark, CST, GSCC, referencibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献62

  • 1陈健飞.福建省土壤分类参比与土壤系统分类检索[J].地球信息科学,2002,4(1):66-70. 被引量:12
  • 2史学正,龚子同.我国东南部不同分类系统中土壤类别归属的对比研究[J].土壤通报,1996,27(3):97-102. 被引量:10
  • 3Galbraith J M, Bryant R. A functional analysis of soil taxonomy in relation to expert system techniques. Soil Science, 1998, 163(9):739~ 747.
  • 4Galbraith J M, Bryant R B, Ahrens R J. An expert system for soil taxonomy. Soil Science, 1998,163(9) :748 ~ 758.
  • 5Bogaert P, Diminitri D'Or. Estimating soil properties from thematic soil map: the Bayesian maximum entropy approach. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002,66(5): 1 492 ~ 1 500.
  • 6Li WD, Zhang C R, Burt J E,et al. Two-dimension Markov Chain simulation of soil type spatial distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004,68(5): 1 479 ~ 1 490.
  • 7Campling P, Gobin A, Feyen J. Logistic modeling to spatially predict the probability of soil drainage classes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002,66(4): 1 390 ~ 1 401.
  • 8Zhu A X, Band L E. A knowledge-based approach to data integration for soil mapping. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 1994,20(4):108 ~ 118.
  • 9Zhu A X, Band L E, Dutton B, Automated soil inference under fuzzy logic. Ecological Modeling, 1996,90:123 ~ 145.
  • 10Zhu A X. Mapping soil landscape as spatial continua:the neural network approach. Water Resources Research, 2000,36(3): 663 ~ 677.

共引文献113

同被引文献207

引证文献21

二级引证文献266

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部