期刊文献+

被害人过错行为的刑法意义研究 被引量:3

Research on significance of the victim's mistake behavior in criminal law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,在西方,被害人过错已经被赋予积极的刑法学意义,它已是减轻行为人刑事责任的法定事由之一。反观中国刑法,这一问题在理论上则很少涉及,在司法上也仅仅将其置于量刑上的酌定情节来对待。这反映了我国刑法学术界和司法实践界对处于刑事法中主体地位之被害人的漠视。不考虑被害人之行为在整个犯罪过程中之主动地位,也严重损害了行为人之人权。文章从我国现行刑法中被害人之刑法地位的不足入手,进而阐述在刑法中将被害人过错行为作为降低被告人刑事责任之法定事由的合理性,最后分析我国设立该理论之模式及其在司法中的具体操作。 In the west, the mistake of victim has positive significance on criminal law. It reduces the legal responsibility of the the conductor. But in criminal law of China, we pay little attentation to it,and merely put it in the judicature in the discretion of punishment to deliberate the plot to treat. However we take little into consideration in the actual operation. This indicates our country ignore the victim's main body status in the criminal law. Not considering behavior of the victim, seriously harmed the human rights of the conductor, the. This article draws up from the insufficiencyof the victim in our country, then pointed that it is reasonable to have the victim mistake behavior as the legal matter of reducing the legal responsibility, finally we will point the pattern of our country in theory and its concrete operation.
机构地区 中国刑警学院
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2006年第2期20-23,70,共5页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 被害人 过错行为 量刑 刑事责任 victim mistake behavior sentence responsibility of criminal law
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1杨兴培.刑事法律关系评说[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),1999,21(1):91-97. 被引量:8
  • 2陈兴良.刑法的人性基础[J].法学研究,1994,16(4):32-39. 被引量:25
  • 3[5][德]汉斯·海因里希·耶塞克,等.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
  • 4[1]Andrew Karmen. Crime Victims: An Introduction of Victimology[M]. Pacific Grove, Califonia:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company,1990.
  • 5[2]Tatjana Hrnle. Distribution of Punishment: The Role of a Victim's Perspective[J]. Buffalo Criminal Law Review,1999.
  • 6[4]Martin Wasik. Crime Seriousness and the Offender-Victim Relationship in Sentencing[A]. in Andrew Ashworth and Martin Wasik(ed.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory[C]. Oxford:Clarendon Press,1998.
  • 7[5]J Dressler. Provocation:Partial Justification or Partical Excuse?[J]. Modern Law Review,1988.
  • 8[6]Magistrates' Association. Sentencing Guidelines(1997)[Z]. guidelines on affray, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, common assault, violent disorder, and unlawful wounding.
  • 9[7]S Jeffreys, L Radford. Contributory Negligence or Being a Woman? The Car Rapist Case[A]. in P.Scraon and P.Gordon(eds.), Causes for Concern[C].1984.
  • 10[8]Magistrates' Association. Sentencing Guidelines(1993)[Z].

共引文献141

同被引文献21

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部