摘要
物权行为理论保护恶意第三人的观点是对德国民法关于第三人规范的误解。在遵从物权行为理论的德国民法中,第三人对前手交易合同瑕疵的知情不为恶意,第三人对出让人无处分权的知情才构成恶意。德国民法对“恶意第三人”的规范是日尔曼民族形式主义交易观念的传承,它与物权行为理论相契合,目的是实现当事人的利益平衡。
It is a misunderstanding to German civil law to hold the viewpoint of juristic act of real right protecting mala fide third party. In German civil law which obeys the theory of juristic act of real right, the third party's acknowledgement of the former contract's defect is not malicious. The third party's acknowledgement of the assignor's not having the right of disposing constitutes male fide. The prescription of "mala fide third pary" in German civil law follows the tradition of Germanic family, which fits it,to the theory of juristic act of real right. Its aim is to balance the benefits of the involved parties.
出处
《政法学刊》
2006年第1期28-31,共4页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
恶意第三人
形式主义
处分权
对称说
mala fide third pary, formalism, right of disposing, symmetry