期刊文献+

文学创作和阅读中的语言问题——论保尔·德曼对“新批评”的批评 被引量:1

Language in the Writing and Reading of Literature: Paul de Man's Criticism of New Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文着重分析了美国文学理论家保尔.德曼对“新批评”的基本语言理论观的质疑,指出他从文本的语言性出发,批评了“新批评”诸如“意图谬误”和文本的“本体论”与“有机整体”等观念。同时,德曼在批评的基础上提出了他的否定性语言观,以提示人们应该充分重视文学创作与阅读中的语言问题。 This paper analyzes Paul de Man's criticism of New Critics' general theoretical claims such as 'Intentional Fallacy','text alone' and 'organic unity.' Based on his negative view of language,de Man reminds people to pay much attention to linguistic problems in the writing and reading of literature.
作者 昂智慧
机构地区 南京大学"
出处 《文艺研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期31-38,共8页 Literature & Art Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Paul de Man,"Resistance to Theory," in The Resistance to Theory,University of Minnesota Press,1986,p.8,p.11.
  • 2Stefano Rosso,"An Interview with Paul de Man ," in The Resistance to Theory,1986,p.121.
  • 3Chris Baldick,Criticism and Literary Theory 1890 to the Present,London and New York:Longman House,1996,p.176.
  • 4Wlad Godzich,"Introduction:Caution! Reader at Work!",in Blindness and Insight,Minneapolis,University of Minnesota Press,1983 ,pXVi.
  • 5Paul de Man,"The Dead-End of Formalist Criticism",in BI,p.230,p.231,p.231,p.232,p.237 ,p.244.
  • 6See William Empson,Seven Types of Ambiguity ,London:Chatto and Windus,1947. BI,p235.
  • 7Paul de Man,Romanticism and Contemporary Criticism,E.S.Burt and others(ed.),Baltimore and London,The Johns Hopkins University Press,1993,pp.145-146.
  • 8The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory & Criticism,Michael Groden and Martin Kreswirth.(ed.),Baltimore and London,The Johns Hopkins Press,1994,p 532.
  • 9Terry Eagleton,Literary Theory:An Introduction,Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1983,pp.47-48.
  • 10Parl de Man,"Form and Intent in the American New Criticism",in BI,p.25,p.25,p.29,p.31,p.32.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部