信息网络传播权在图书馆的行使与限制——《信息网络传播权保护条例(草案)》第四条第(五)款、第六条评析

Several Opinions about Exempt Clauses in Information Spreading on Network in Libraries

本文主要阐述了对《草案》第四条第（五）款的立法建议：将“公共图书馆”改为“非赢利性图书馆”或“图书馆因非赢利性目的”；对“应当根据情况”中的“情况”予以列举，或规定原则性衡量标准；补充图书馆为保存数字信息和开展馆际互借服务的合理使用权利；对合理使用制度采用“混合式立法模式”。对《草案》第六条的立法建议：把该条中的“公共图书馆”直接改为“图书馆”；规定各级政府为法定许可使用费的支付主体；考虑图书馆的公益性和非赢利性，在制定付酬标准时，将图书馆与社会上的商业网站加以区别；应该在建立“数字化复制法定许可”制度的基础上构筑“信息网络传播权法定许可”制度；立法机关在制定法定许可付酬标准时应该对图书馆可能分别向“复制权”、“信息网络传播权”付费的“两次付费”的情况给以考量；“中国文字作品著作权协会”为法定许可使用费的管理机构；法定许可费的分配，应侧重于对作者的补偿，同时兼顾社会利益，包括版权集体管理组织开展管理的合理成本和对作者的补偿以及建立基金会（作者养老基金、社会基金、科学基金）等三大部分；对《草案》颁布实施前未附带“版权声明”的图书法定许可使用作出变通性规定；把在图书中附带“版权声明”作为作者的一项法定义务进行规定，并在《出版管理条例》等行政法规中补充有关内容。

The essay first offers some legisiative suggestions about Article 4, Section5 of ＂the Draft＂; Change public library into non-profit library, or explain that the purposes of libraries are not for profit： for ＂the situations＂ in ＂Should according to the situations＂, examples are demanded, or certain measurable critetion ought to be provided ;add to that libraries could have copyright to preserve and share the information sources; adopt mixed mode of legislation to the System of Rational Use. In Articie 6 of ＂the Draft＂, it is better to do the following adjustment： Change public Ibraries directly into libraries; make it a rule that governments at all levels are the train body that is responsible to bare the expenses for the use of copyright; fully consider the public welfare and non- profit nature of libraries, diffenentiate libraries from common commercial websites while pricing the information services; establish Legal Permission System for Digital Duplication, and furthermore draw up Legal Permission System for Information Spreading on Network; when fixing the prices of legal permission both two parts of fees Frost be taken into account, one is for duplication, the other for information spneading on network; to authorize ＂Intellectual Right Organization of China＇ s Character Works＂ the administrative organ for these legal permission fees; so far as the use of these fees collected is concerned, it is proper that authors must be taken to the first place, then public interests be considered as well, it including costs of Copyright Collective Administrative Organizations and relevant funds（old -age pension for authors, social funds and scientific funds）; make appropriate adaptations to the legal permission right of the works publishsed before ＂the Draft＂ promulgated; take copyright declaration which used to attached to the works as a legal respoesibility of the authors, and put it into Publishing Administrative Regulations and other rlues.