期刊文献+

非形式逻辑的核心概念:“论证” 被引量:7

The central conception of Informal Logic or Logic of Argument:"Argument"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论证概念是包括非形式逻辑在内的论辩理论的核心。将论证理解为语义学概念还是语用学(辩证的)概念是非形式逻辑和经典逻辑的分水岭。对论证理解的逐步宽泛化,本质上就是对它不断增加功能性内涵,以使其适应更广阔的论域。所幸的是,与北美日常英语不同,汉语中的“论证”没有否定性的意味,这就使得日益丰富的论证概念可直接被应用于汉语日常论辩。 The conception of argument is a core of argumentation theory including informal logic. Understanding argument as a semantic conception or as pragmatic conception is the watershed between informal logic and classical logic. To expand of understanding of argument is essentially to add constantly functional intensions to conception of argument, so that the conception be suited to broader field. Fortunately, different with daily English in north America, "argument" have no the meaning of negativeness in Chinese, this makes increasingly rich conception of argument can had been directly applied to daily argumentation in Chinese.
作者 武宏志
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第2期39-45,共7页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 非形式逻辑 论证 论辩 论证的语义学概念 论证的言语行为概念 论证的功能概念 论证的辩证概念 非言语的论证概念 informal logic argument argumentation semantic conception of argument functional conception ofargument dialectical conception of argument non- discursive conception of argument
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1Ralph H. Johnson. Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts[J] 2002,Argumentation(3):311~331
  • 2M. A. Van Rees. Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument[J] 2001,Argumentation(2):231~237

同被引文献101

引证文献7

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部