期刊文献+

异步交互中远程学习者教学交互水平的研究 被引量:38

Research on distance learners' instructional interaction level in asynchronous interaction
原文传递
导出
摘要 远程教育领域的许多研究发现,在各种同步或异步的教学交互过程中,存在着大量的观望者,他们并没有积极参与教师组织的教学交互活动,只是”旁观”其他学习者的教学交互。研究者和实践者开始关心是否所有的远程学习者都能够通过精心设计的教学交互活动,实现有效的学习。本文以远程学习中的教学交互模型为理论基础,分别利用Bales的交互过程分析法和及Gunawardena的基于建构主义的线索解析模型,对比研究了异步交互活动中的“参与者”和“观望者”在异步交互中教学交互水平。同时,作者结合异步教学交互中学习者的交互形式以及活动特点,分析了造成这两类学习者教学交互水平差异的主要原因。 Many researches in the field of distance education have found out that in the process of various synchronous and asynchronous instructional interactions, there are many lurkers, who do not participate proactively in the activities of instructional interaction organized by the teachers, but merely look on the instructional interaction of other students. Researchers and practitioners come to concern whether all of the distance learners may realize effective learning through elaborately-designed activities of instructional interaction.This article has taken the instructional interaction model of distance learning as its theoretical basis and has made use respectively of Bale's Interaction Process Analysis and Gunawardena's Analysis Model for Threaded Information based on constructivism to comparatively study the instructional interaction level on the part of participants and lurkers in the asynchronous interactive activities. The authors go further to make analysis of the principal reasons to result in the differences of the two parts' instructional interaction level in the light of interactive forms and features of certain activities on the part of students. They then make further approaches on the students' preparation for participation in the discussion groups. In the end, they explore furthermore on the major issues of content analysis method for on-line discussion.
作者 曹良亮 陈丽
出处 《中国远程教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第02S期12-16,25,共6页 Chinese Journal of Distance Education
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Gunawardena, C., C. Lowe, and T. Anderson. Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining the social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1997.17(4): 397-431.
  • 2Henri, F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, ed. A. Kaye, 117-36. London: Springer-Verlag. 1991.
  • 3Bates, A. W. "The impact of technological change on open and distance learning', Distance Education, 1997, vol. 18, no.l, pp. 93-109.
  • 4Sanna Jarvela & Paivi Hakinen Web-based cases in teaching and learning- the quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication, 1999
  • 5Borg, W., and M. Gall. The methods and tools of observational research. In Educational research: An introduction (5th ed). eds. W. Borg and M. Gall, 473-530. London: Longman. 1989.
  • 6Bales, R. F.. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press. 1950
  • 7Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D.R. & Archer, W. Assessing teaching presence in a computer confereneing context. Paper presented at the annual meeting, American Educational Research Association, Seattle, April 2001 10 - 14.
  • 8D. Randy Garrison, Terry Anderson, and Walter Archer ,Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education 2004
  • 9Garrison, D,, Anderson, T. and Archer, W. Critical Thinking and Computer Conferencing: A Model and Tool to Assess Cognitive Presence http://www.atl.ualberta.ca/cmc/CogPresPaper_June30_.pdf
  • 10C. Candace Chou , A Comparative Content Analysis of Student Interaction in Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning Networks

二级参考文献47

  • 1陈丽,陈青.利用电子媒价“双向交互”的基本原理和实践中的问题──实时交互远程教学实验的个案研究[J].中国远程教育,1999(11):43-46. 被引量:6
  • 2约瑟夫.佩尔顿,丁兴富.技术和教育:朋友还是仇敌?(一)[J].中国远程教育,1992(11):45-48. 被引量:3
  • 3林崇德 辛涛.智力的培养[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1997.247-428.
  • 4黄荣怀.[D].,.
  • 5Hillman, D.C.A. et al. (1994). "Learner-interface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary, models and strategies for practitioners", American Journal of Distance Education. vol.8, no.2, 30-42.
  • 6Holmberg, B. (1983). Theory. and Practice of Distance Education.London: Routledge.
  • 7Laurillard. D. (2001). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
  • 8Moore, M. (1989). Three types of interaction, The American Journal of Distance Education, 2, 1-6.
  • 9Bates. A. W. (1991). Interaetivity as a criterion for mellia selection in distance education. Nexer Too Far. vol.16. June 1991. 5-9.
  • 10Moore & Kearsley (1996)) Distance Education: A system View. NewYork: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

同被引文献411

引证文献38

二级引证文献270

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部