摘要
文献[2]给出了一个十分特殊的关于经济外部性的模型,并由这个模型导出了一些奇怪的结论.事实上,这些不正确的结论正是源于文献[2]的作者在其模型中对MCR曲线给出的两个解释.其一,MCR曲线表示“为降低污染所花费的边际成本”;其二,又将其“解释为降低污染给社会带来的边际利益曲线,因为农民将从降低污染中受益”.这种将成本与收益混淆起来的逻辑错误,使得整个模型及其结论都是不成立的.
The author of [2] gives a rather special model about of externality of economics, from which some strange conclusions are derived. In fact, the wrong conclusions originate from the two explanations for curve MCR in his model. First, the curve stands for the marginal cost which is spent for reducing pollution; Second, it is also explained as marginal social reap curve which is brought by reducing pollution, which makes people get reap. These logical mistakes confuse the cost and reap, and make the whole model and its conclusions be incorrect.
出处
《辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版)》
CAS
北大核心
2006年第1期12-13,共2页
Journal of Liaoning Normal University:Natural Science Edition