期刊文献+

Numerical Simulation of Leakage Effect for Quantum NOT Operation on Three-Josephson-Junction Flux Qubit

Numerical Simulation of Leakage Effect for Quantum NOT Operation on Three-Josephson-Junction Flux Qubit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Superconducting flux qubits with three Josephson junctions are promising candidates for the building blocks of a quantum computer. We have applied the imaginary time evolution method to study the model of this qubit accurately by calculating its wavefunctions and eigenenergies. Because such qubits are manipulated with magnetic flux microwave pulses, they might be irradiated into non-computational states, which is called the leakage effect. By the evolution of the density matrix of the qubit under either hard-shaped π-pulse or Caussian-shaped π-pulse to carry out quantum NOT operation, it has been demonstrated that the leakage effect for a flux qubit is very small even for hard-shaped microwave pulses while Caussian-shaped pulses may suppress the leakage effect to a negligible level. Superconducting flux qubits with three Josephson junctions are promising candidates for the building blocks of a quantum computer. We have applied the imaginary time evolution method to study the model of this qubit accurately by calculating its wavefunctions and eigenenergies. Because such qubits are manipulated with magnetic flux microwave pulses, they might be irradiated into non-computational states, which is called the leakage effect. By the evolution of the density matrix of the qubit under either hard-shaped π-pulse or Caussian-shaped π-pulse to carry out quantum NOT operation, it has been demonstrated that the leakage effect for a flux qubit is very small even for hard-shaped microwave pulses while Caussian-shaped pulses may suppress the leakage effect to a negligible level.
出处 《Chinese Physics Letters》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第4期971-974,共4页 中国物理快报(英文版)
关键词 PERSISTENT-CURRENT QUBIT REAL-SPACE ALGORITHM DYNAMICS STATE PERSISTENT-CURRENT QUBIT REAL-SPACE ALGORITHM DYNAMICS STATE
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Mukhlin Yu, Schon G and Shnirman A 2001 Rev. Mod.Phys. 73 357.
  • 2Devoret M H and Martinis J M 2004 Quantum Inform.Process. 3 163.
  • 3Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • 4Mooij J E et al 1999 Science 285 1036.
  • 5Orlando T P et al 1999 Phys. Rev. B 60 15398.
  • 6van der Wal C H et al 2000 Science 290 773.
  • 7Chiorescu I, Nakamura Y, Harmans C J and Mooij J E 2003 Science 299 1869.
  • 8Greenberg Y S et al 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 214525.Greenberg Y S et al 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 224511.Greenberg Y S et al 2002 Phys. Rev. B 68 224517.
  • 9You J Q, Nakamura Y and Nori Franco 2005 Phys. Rev, B71 024532.
  • 10Nakamura Y, Pashkin Y A and Tsai J S 1999 Nature 398 768.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部