摘要
管仲是中国历史上一位有争议的重要人物。孔子对管仲的评论,也成为历来一个有争议的话题。肯定派学者理解为孔子称许管仲为仁人,这符合孔子本意;半肯定派理解为只谓其有仁者之功,未许为仁人,这种认识带有片面性;否定派认为孔子未曾以仁论管仲,这是完全错误的。孔子评管仲为仁人,有其理论上的根据,符合历史事实,是正确的。
Guan Zhong is an important but controversial figure in Chinese history. And Confucius' s evaluation of Guan Zhong has also been a disputed subject. The positive scholars hold that Confucius evaluates Guan Zhong as a benevolent man. This does accord with Confucius' s original idea. The semi-positive scholars claim that Guan Zhong, according to Confucius' s idea, only has the exploits of a benevolent man, but is not a benevolent man. This is an one-sided view. The negative scholars insist that Confucius' does not evaluate Guan Zhong by the standard of benevolence. This is a wrong conclusion. Confucius' evaluating Guan Zhong as a benevolent man has his theoretical basis, and does conform to the historical facts.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第2期48-52,共5页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
关键词
孔子
论管仲
争议
Confucius
evaluation to Guan Zhong
dispute