期刊文献+

关于孔子论管仲的争议 被引量:10

Disputes on Confucius's Evaluation to Guan Zhong
下载PDF
导出
摘要 管仲是中国历史上一位有争议的重要人物。孔子对管仲的评论,也成为历来一个有争议的话题。肯定派学者理解为孔子称许管仲为仁人,这符合孔子本意;半肯定派理解为只谓其有仁者之功,未许为仁人,这种认识带有片面性;否定派认为孔子未曾以仁论管仲,这是完全错误的。孔子评管仲为仁人,有其理论上的根据,符合历史事实,是正确的。 Guan Zhong is an important but controversial figure in Chinese history. And Confucius' s evaluation of Guan Zhong has also been a disputed subject. The positive scholars hold that Confucius evaluates Guan Zhong as a benevolent man. This does accord with Confucius' s original idea. The semi-positive scholars claim that Guan Zhong, according to Confucius' s idea, only has the exploits of a benevolent man, but is not a benevolent man. This is an one-sided view. The negative scholars insist that Confucius' does not evaluate Guan Zhong by the standard of benevolence. This is a wrong conclusion. Confucius' evaluating Guan Zhong as a benevolent man has his theoretical basis, and does conform to the historical facts.
作者 冯浩菲
出处 《文史哲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期48-52,共5页 Literature,History,and Philosophy
关键词 孔子 论管仲 争议 Confucius evaluation to Guan Zhong dispute
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,1980..
  • 2王引之.经传释词[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1990.
  • 3朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,2001..
  • 4黎靖德编.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1999.
  • 5顾炎武.日知录[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.
  • 6俞樾.诸子平议[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 7诸子集成[C].上海:上海书店,1986.

共引文献456

同被引文献44

引证文献10

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部