期刊文献+

雷贝拉唑对糜烂性反流性食管炎患者食管内pH影响的对照研究

A Controlled Study of Rabeprazole in the Treatment of Erosive Reflux Esophagitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解雷贝拉唑对糜烂性反流性食管炎(RE)患者的疗效及食管内pH的影响。方法:59例经内镜诊断为RE的患者,其中男36例,女23例,平均年龄(37±5.72)岁,随机分为A组及B组,A组患者服用雷贝拉唑10mg,每日一次,共14天;B组患者服用奥美拉唑20mg,每日一次,共14天。结果:A组治疗前食管内pH<4的时间(min)、pH<4的次数、pH<4(%)分别为:120±51、106±70、13±3.2;治疗后则分别为12.58±6、63.33±9.5及1.4±0.2;B组治疗前食管内pH<4的时间(min)、pH<4的次数、pH<4(%)分别为115±66、133±71及15±1.9;治疗后则分别为15.21±11、13.1±10.2及2.9±1.5。两组治疗前后均差别有显著性(P<0.001),两组之间的差别无显著性(P>0.05)。内镜检查的结果表明:两组治疗前后均有显著改善。结论:雷贝拉唑是治疗RE的首选药物,个体差异性较小,其疗效与抑酸效果有关。 Objective. To explore the possible effect of rabeprazole on erosive reflux esophagitis (RE) and its pH. Methods: 59 patients including 36 male and 23 female, mean age of 37±5. 72yr, who were diagnosed as RE by gastroendoscope, were randomly divided into groups A and group B, and treated with Rabeprazole (10mg once daily for 14 days) and Omeprazole (20mg once daily for 14 days) respectively. The results were compared between two groups. Results: In the group A, the continued time in pH〈C4, the pH〈S4 numbers and fraction time of pH〈4(%) was 120±51, 106±70, 13±3. 2 and 12. 58±6,63.33±9. 5, 1.4±0. 2 before and after treatment respectively; in the group B, it was 115±66, 133±71, 15±1.9 and 15. 21±11, 13. 1±10, 2. 9±1.5 before and after treatment respectively. There were significant differences of the time of pH〈4, the pH〈4 numbers and fraction time of pH〈4(%) between group A and group B. The gastroendoscopic examination indicated that the significant improvement of esophageal mucosa was found in both groups. Conclusions: Rabeprazole is the first choice for the treatment of RE and without individual difference; the effect related to the powerful effect of acid inhibition.
出处 《青海医药杂志》 2006年第3期4-6,共3页 Qinghai Medical Journal
关键词 雷贝拉唑 反流性食管炎 奥关拉唑 内镜检查 Rabeprazole Reflux esophagitis Omeprazole
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Chinese GERD Study Group. Value of reflux diagnostic questionnaire in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Chinese Journal of Digestive Diseases, 2004,5:51-55.
  • 2Dekkers CP, Beker JA, Thjodlefesson B, et al. Double-blind comparison of rabeprazole 20mg vs. omeprazole 20mg in the treatment of erosive or ulcerative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1999,13:49-57.
  • 3Dekkers CPM, Beker JA, Thjodlefesson B, et al.Comparison of rebeprazole 20mg vs. omeprazole 20mg in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer:a European multicentre study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1999,13:179-186.
  • 4Stedman CA, Barclay ML. Review article:comparison of the pharmacokinetics, acid suppression and efficacy of proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2000,14:963-978.
  • 5Saches G, Shin JM, Briving C, Wallmark B, et al. The pharmacology of the gastric acid pump: the H^+ -K^+ -ATPase. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 1995, 35: 277-305.
  • 6Beradi RR. A critical evauation of proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease Am J Manag Care, 2000,6 suppl 9:491-505.
  • 7Katz PO, Anderson C, Khoury R, et al. Castro-esophageal reflux associated with nocturnal gastric acid breakthrogh on proton pump irdaibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1998,93:1231-1234.
  • 8Daroman HG, Burhardt F. Pantoprazole versus omeprazole:influence on meal-stimulated gastric acid secretion. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 1999, 11:1277-1282.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部