期刊文献+

将中美纺织品贸易争端提交DSB解决的理论研究

Studies of Bringing Sino-U.S. Disputes on Textile Trade to the DSB for Settlement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “特保”和“特限”是中美纺织品争端的焦点。澄清有关“特保”和“特限”规则中的模糊之处是解决中美纺织品争端的关键。文章将中美纺织品贸易争端提交DSB,争取以判例的形式明确启动“特保”和“特限”应具备的法律要件,为我国纺织品出口创造较好的国际法律环境。 The focus of Sino-U.S. dispues on textile trade lies in "Special Safeguard" and "Special Restrict and clarifying the fuzzy part of the two rules becomes crucial for settlement of the dispues. The paper "points out that it is rational to present the disputes to the DSB for settlement and demand for the necessary legal documents required by the two rules in the form of institutional award so as to secure a good international legal environment for China" s textiles and garments.
作者 刘阳
机构地区 深圳大学法学院
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期34-37,共4页 International Economics and Trade Research
关键词 特保 特限 DSB 中关纺织品贸易谈判 The WTO rules quota safeguard protection antidumping the DSB Sino-U.S. negotiations on textile rade
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1赵维田《中国法学》网.
  • 2《中国人世议定书》第16条.
  • 3钟布.美国贸易逆差影响中国出口[N].新加坡联合早报,2004-02-15.
  • 4王传丽.国际贸易法[M].北京:法律出版社,2004,378-383.
  • 5Marc L. Busch and Eric Reinhardt.Developing Countries and general Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement.Journal of World Trade (law/economics/public policy)[J].Vol.37 No.4 August 2003.
  • 6Jose Luis Perez GABILONDO.Developing Countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures[A],Journal of World Trade[J].Vol.35 No.4 2001.
  • 7Ole Kristian FAUCHALD.Flexibility and Predictability Under the World Trade Organization's Non-Discrimination Clause [A].Journal of World Trade[J].Vol.37No.3June 2003.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部