摘要
在以往的反倾销案例中,有关当局大都是采用确定倾销损害的第一条标准,即实质性损害的存在来确定倾销损害的成立,而对判定倾销损害存在的第二标准和第三标准却鲜有援引。文章试图通过对有关反倾销案例的观察与分析,阐明判定倾销损害存在的第二条标准即实质性损害威胁在反倾销实践中的运用。
In previous anti-dumping cases, the authorities concerned only apply the first criterion to confirm the dumping harm. It is rarely seen that the second and the third criteria are applied. The paper, by examining the relevant ani-dumping cases, attempts to discuss the application of the second criterion-the threat of material harm-in determining dumping harm in anti-dumping practices.
出处
《国际经贸探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第2期48-50,共3页
International Economics and Trade Research