《孔子诗论》与戴震的《诗经》研究

On Daizhen's Notes of Book of Poetry and Confucius' Poetics

戴震反对前人舍《诗序》而论《诗》,以毛、郑为“陋儒”,定郑、卫为“淫诗”的作法,肯定了《毛诗序》为子夏之学,即使非其亲为,而其中之师承当不诬;并且认为,“变风变雅”也如“正风正雅”一样,同样反映了社会现实生活,与“里巷狭邪”,淫僻烦惑之事毫无关系。由今日出土的材料可见,戴震所言与《诗论》的意旨极其相近。以《孔子诗论》与戴震治《诗》的基本观点作比较,说明了戴氏的《诗经》研究著述对今日的《诗论》研究具有重要的借鉴意义,同时,《诗论》也为研究戴震的治《诗》成就出示了证明。

Based on the comparison between the standpoints of Daizhen＇s notes of Book of Poetry and Confucius＇ Poetics, this paper observes the ideas and methodologies in Dai＇s process of annotating poetics and his great achievements by means of the co-reference of the exhaustive ancient materials and the ever-inherited documents. Meanwhile, in terms of Dai＇s achievements in his field, this paper further approaches the various existing problems in its study.