期刊文献+

术后病理性腹腔粘连大鼠模型制作的实验研究 被引量:6

Experimental model of post-operative intra-peritoneal adhesion in rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究术后病理性腹腔粘连大鼠模型的制作及运用。方法:用一种尚未见报道的锉刀与干纱布、血管钳、刀片在大鼠蚓突造模,进行大鼠腹腔粘连模型制作的优选。将40只模型SD雄性大鼠(清洁级)随机分为A组(纱布组)、B组(血管钳组)、C组(锉刀组)、D组(刀片组),每组10只,饲养7 d,第8 d处死小鼠,采用Ph illips五级评分法对腹腔粘连进行统计分析。结果:A、B两组造模效果均为Ph illips五级评分标准的Ⅰ级,C组为达Ⅳ级,D组达Ⅲ级,C组与A、B、D组之间两两比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。B组病死率为10%,D组达20%,经统计学处理四组间无明显差异(P=0.276 4)。结论:以大鼠的蚓突制作术后病理性腹腔粘连动物模型,锉刀为最佳造模工具,其优点是造模均匀,均达Ⅳ级。 Objective:To set up an animal model of intraabdominal adhesion after surgery. Methods:A new rat model of intraabdominal adhesion was made by using pincers, dry gauze, hemostatic clamps and razor blade. Rat appendix was used to produce intestinal adhesions. Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups: group A( gauze group), group B (hemostatic clamp group), group C (pincer group), group D(razor blade group), 10 rats in each group. Animals were fed for 7 days before killed. The extent of adhesion was evaluated by Phillips scale and analyzed statistically. Results: The extents of adhesion in group A and B were grade Ⅰ by Phillips scale, grade Ⅳ in group C, grade Ⅲ in group D. The extent of adhesion in group C was different significantly from group A, B, and D (P 〈 0.05). The death rate in group B was 10% and 20% in group D, which were not different statistically (P = 0. 2764). Conclusion: The best way to make a rat model of intraabdominal adhesion is by using rat appendix and rubbed with a pincer, which has the benefit of generalized distribution and extent to grade Ⅳ.
机构地区 南京中医药大学
出处 《医学研究生学报》 CAS 2006年第3期229-231,共3页 Journal of Medical Postgraduates
基金 江苏省教育基金资助项目(批准号:05KJB360094) 江苏省中医药管理基金资助项目(批准号:H05062)
关键词 腹腔粘连 大鼠 模型 锉刀法 Abdominal cavity' s adhesion Rat Model File
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

  • 1匡培根,王国平,郎森阳,于生元,朱克.东菱精纯克栓酶治疗缺血性脑血管病[J].中国新药杂志,1994,3(6):36-39. 被引量:177
  • 2胡建敏,黄绍贤.人体脂肪,α—糜蛋白酶联合腹腔灌注预防粘连的实验及临床研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,1989,6(3):101-103. 被引量:54
  • 3[1]Krahenbuhl L,Schafer M,Kuzinkovas V et al. Experimental study of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic fundoplication[J]. Br J Surg,1998,85(6): 826-830.
  • 4[2]Nakatani K, Takeshita S, Tsujimoto H et al. Inhibitory effect of serine protease inhibitors on neutrophil-mediated endothelial cell injury[J]. J Leukoc Biol,2001,69(2): 241-247.
  • 5[3]Crha I,Ventruba P,Petrenko M et al. Present possibilities of prevention of adhesions and their immunologic aspects[J]. Ceska Gynekol,1999,64(4): 230-234.
  • 6[5]Liakakos T,Thomakos N,Fine PM et al. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology,pathophysiology,and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management[J].Dig Surg,2001,18(4): 260-273.
  • 7[6]Pugia MJ, Takemura T, Kuwajima S et al. Clinical utility of a rapid test for uristatin[J]. Clin Biochem, 2002,35(2): 105-110.
  • 8[7]Lin SD, Endo R, Sato A et al. Plasma and urine levels of urinary trypsin inhibitor in patients with acute and fulminant hepatitis[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2002,17(2): 140-147.
  • 9[8]Ambiru S, Miyazaki M, Sasada K et al. Effects of perioperative protease inhibitor on inflammatory cytokines and acute-phase proteins in patients with hepatic resection[J].Dig Surg,2000,17(4):337-343.
  • 10[9]Saba AA,Godziachvili V,Mavani AK et al. Serum levels of interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha correlate with peritoneal adhesion grades in humans after major abdominal surgery[J]. Am Surg,1998,64(8):734-736.

共引文献13

同被引文献77

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部