摘要
秩序是社会获得存在和发展的必然要求,也是法律的重要价值目标之一。人类法治 化历程存在着两种发展模式,其一为建构理性主义路径,另一为经验理性主义路径,两者都殊途 同归地实现了法治化道路。为此,台湾当局在对大陆经贸立法活动中选择建构理性模式并无可厚 非,问题在于,台湾当局的大陆经贸立法进程,在相当程度上忽视了秩序的“自发性”,从而使 得经由立法活动输出的相关法令无法达成法律应有的功能。因此,台湾的大陆经贸立法范式有待 进一步转换,即在立法政策上,实现从以“政治为导向”向以“经济为导向”的转换;在立法内 容上,实现“差别待遇”向“公平待遇”的转换。
Order is the necessary requirement of social development, and important value of law. There is no problem that Taiwan authorities choose the rational model to make the law on the field of economy and trade. But the problem is, at a certain extent the lawmaking process of Taiwan authorities ignored the spontaneity of lawmaking. That make the law cannot convey the original functions of the law. So the model of Taiwan authorities' lawmaking should be changed: from the political-orientation to economy-orientation, and from discrimination treatment to fair treatment
出处
《台湾研究集刊》
CSSCI
2005年第4期1-7,共7页
Taiwan Research Journal
关键词
立法
秩序
两岸经贸关系
范式转换
Lawmaking, Order, Cross-straits economic relations, shift of models