期刊文献+

学校心理教育绩效评估体系初探 被引量:4

The Performance Appraisal System of School Psychological Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学校心理教育绩效评估是学校进行心理教育的重要一环,而对学校心理教育绩效评估体系的设计更是一项系统的工程。在对学校心理教育绩效进行评估时必须遵循客观原则、动态原则、封闭原则等。学校心理教育绩效评估体系包括评估指标体系设计、评估过程、评估结果的分析评价与结果的反馈。在确定学校心理教育绩效评估指标体系时,必须遵循绩效评估指标体系设立的可操作性原则;发展性和补救性的目标也应渗透到评估指标体系的设计中去;评估过程主要是评估方式和方法的选择和应用。对绩效评估的结果进行定量分析和定性分析,这样可以比较全面地、准确地反映学校心理教育的工作绩效。 It is playing a role in appraising the performance of school psychological education, moreover it is a whole project to design a performance appraisal system. When appraising the performance of school psychological education, we should comply with the principle of objective, dynamic, close and so on. The system includes the device of appraisal standard system, the appraisal process, the analysis and response. When appraisal standard system is devised, it should be operational, which includes goal of development and recovery. Appraisal process means the choice and use of appraisal methods. Appraisal results are analysised in the way of quota and quality, which can accurately reflect the performance of school psychological education.
作者 张秀敏
机构地区 南京邮电大学
出处 《东华理工学院学报(社会科学版)》 2005年第4期516-519,共4页 Journal of East China Institute of Technology
关键词 心理教育 绩效 绩效评估体系 学校 psychological education performance the performance appraisal system
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1Bernardin,H. J. ,Hangan,C. M. ,Kane,J. S. & Villanova,P. ,In Performance Appraisal:State of the Art in Practice ,Simither ,J. W. editor ,San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.
  • 2Cardy, R. L. , & Dobbins, G. H. , Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives, Cincinnati, OH: SouthWestern Publishing Co. ,1994.
  • 3Bernardin,H. J. , ‘Behavioral expectation scales versus summated scales:A fairer comparison' ,Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977 (62): 422- 427.
  • 4Landy ,F. J. & Farr ,J. L. , ‘Performance ratings' ,Psychological Bulletin, 1980 (87): 72 - 107.
  • 5Pulakos,E. D. , ‘The development of training programs to increased accuracy in different rating tasks',Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986 (38): 76 - 91.
  • 6De Nisi,A. S. ,Cafferty,T. P. & Meglino ,B. M. , ‘A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process :A model and research propositions' ,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984 (33): 360- 396.
  • 7Zajonc, R. B. , ‘Feeling and thinking: Perferences need no inferences', American Psychologist, 1980 (35):151-175.
  • 8Wayne, S. J. & Ferris, G. R. , ‘Influence tactics ,affect ,and exchange quality in supervisor- subordinate interactions' ,Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990(75): 487- 499.
  • 9Borman, W. C. , White, L. A. & Dorsey, D. W. , ‘Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonalfactors on supervisor and peer performance ratings' ,Journal of Applied Psycholgoy, 1995 (80): 168- 177.
  • 10Ferris ,G. R. & Judeg, T. A. , ‘Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective',Journal of management, 1991 (17): 1 - 42.

共引文献184

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部