摘要
斯密和李斯特是政治经济学说史上的重要人物。目前学术界对于二者生产力思想的研究仍有一些空白和薄弱环节。从国民财富得以增进的原因的角度考察,斯密和李斯特的生产力思想既有相近的地方,也有一定程度的差异,但分歧似乎并没有我们想象的那么大。二者生产力思想的这种异同,不仅揭示了思想所由产生的特定文化传统和国家境遇,而且也表明各个国家发展生产力应该遵循一定的共同规律。
Adam Smith and Franz There are still some weak points and blank pages in the study of List are significant in political economics. their thought of productivity nowadays. In terms of the reasons for the growth of national wealth, Smith and List have both similarityies and differences. While the difference is not so big as is thought before. The similarities and differences reveals not only that the cultural tradition and the nation's condition gestate the thought, but also that all nations should obey certain rules to develop productivity.
出处
《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》
2005年第6期31-34,共4页
Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)