摘要
“劳动价值论”在马克思批判资本主义制度时才有其“政治意义”,置放于现代社会主义社会中,其“政治意义”自然消解。而从哲学的立场或用哲学的思维和方法来解决关于“劳动价值论”的纷争,就会正好看到:“价值”的真实形态本来就是“使用价值”,“劳动”的真实形态本来就是“具体劳动”。因而,所谓“使用价值和抽象价值”、“具体劳动和抽象劳动”在其经济意义上就成为了“假问题”,而围绕“假问题”的所有争论将毫无意义。哲学视域中的“劳动价值论”要着力表明的结论是:所有参与创造“使用价值”的“要素”在价值财富的创造和分配中都具有公平的地位;所有参与“具体劳动”的“要素”在劳动财富的创造和分配中都具有公平的地位。新的经济制度应在此意义上而创新。
"Work value theory" has its "political significance" only when Marx criticized capitalist sys tem, but its "political significance" has been disappeared naturally in the modern socialism society. While from the philosophical standpoint or the philosophical thought and method, we can see that the real original morphology of "Value" is "usage value"~ the real morphology of "Work" is "concrete work". Thus, the so-called "usage value and abstract value", the "concrete work and abstract labor" became "fake question" in its economical significance. Therefore, all arguments around the "fake question" will be meaningless. The philosophical sight of the "Work value theory" wants to demonstrate that each participating "essential factor" creating the "usage value" has its fair status in the value wealth creation and the assignment; each participating "essential factor" creating the "concrete work" has its fair status in the work wealth creation and the assignment. The new economic system should be innovated based on this significance.
出处
《北京市经济管理干部学院学报》
2006年第1期22-27,共6页
Journal of Beijing Economic Management Institute
关键词
哲学视域
价值原态
劳动价值论
意义转换
philosophical sight
the original morphology of "Value"
Work value theory meaning
transferring