期刊文献+

广州市六所中学初中男生吸烟行为影响因素的结构方程模型 被引量:14

Analysis on factors influencing the smoking behaviors among male secondary school students under the structural equation model
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析广州市青少年吸烟行为影响因素的直接与间接作用。方法利用自填式问卷调查2021名初中男生的吸烟相关信息,确证性因子分析构建测量模型,迭代加权最小二乘法(ERLS法)估计参数,通过评价修正来确定最佳模型。结果提取了三个环境因素潜变量,即监护人限制、吸烟环境和学校环境。吸烟相关态度只提取一个潜变量。模型拟合效果较好,模型能解释吸烟行为38.8%的变异。对吸烟行为起直接作用的有:吸烟环境、监护人限制、拒烟决心和吸烟态度等。年级、健康知识和学校环境则起间接作用。危险因素排序:吸烟环境(45.76%)>吸烟态度(19.88%)>年级(0.44%);保护因素排序:拒烟决心(16.61%)>监护人限制(10.51%)>健康知识(3.89%)>学校环境(2.92%)。结论健康知识只能通过相关信念而对学生吸烟行为起间接的抑制作用,且贡献比例很低。年级的增长对学生吸烟行为的促进作用大于抑制作用。青少年控烟不能只限于健康教育,环境因素应受到高度重视。 Objective To analyze the direct and indirect outcomes of influencing factors on smoking behaviors among adolescents. Methods Self-adminlstered questionnaires were used to collect smokingrelated information from 2021 respondents. Measurement models were built by confirmatory factor analysis and parameters were estimated by ERLS method. The final structural equation model was determined by comprehensive evaluation and necessary modification. Results Three latent variables were extracted from 10 manifest variables of environment, while only one latent variable was identified from 9 manifest variables of attitudes. The goodness of fit for the structural equation model was satisfactory that all indices had met corresponding requirements. The final model could explain 38.8% of the variance of smoking behaviors. Four factors (smoking environment, smoking restriction from parents and teachers, determination of cigarette refusal and attitudes toward smoking) were directly affecting the smoking behaviors, while another three factors(grade, health knowledge and school environment) had indirect impacts. According to the percentages of their contribution, the risk factors were ranked as follows: smoking environment (45.76%), attitudes toward smoklng(19.88%) and grade at school(0.44%). Similarly, the top proteetlve factor were: determination of cigarette refusal( 16.61% ), followed by smoking restriction from parents and teachers ( 10.51%), health knowledge (3.89%) and school environment (2.92%). Conclusions Heath knowledge had minor effect on smoking in adolescents but could indirectly affect their smoking behaviors through changing their belief. Grade at school had a doubled influence on smoking, but mainly served as a risk factor. Tobacco control measures for adolescents should not only be limited to health education but environment factors as well.
出处 《中华流行病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期234-237,共4页 Chinese Journal of Epidemiology
基金 中华医学基金会资助项目(00-729)
关键词 吸烟行为 青少年 结构方程模型 影响因素 Smoking behavlors Adolescents Structural equation model Influence factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Flay BR,Hu FB,Richardson J.Psychosocial predictors of different stages of cigarette smoking among high school students.Prev Med,1998,27(5 Pt 3):A9-A18.
  • 2Botvin G J,Baker E,Botvin EM,et al.Factors promoting cigarette smoking among black youth:a causal modeling approach.Addict Behavior,1993,18:397-405.
  • 3Zhang L,Wang WF,Zhao QF,ct al.Psychosocial predictors of smoking among secondary school students in Henan,China.Health Education Research,2000,15:415-422.
  • 4Carosella AM,Ossip Klein DJ,Owens CA.Smoking attitudes,beliefs,and readiness to change among acute and long term care inpatients with psychiatric diagnoses.Addict Behavior,1999,24:331-344.
  • 5巫朝根.中小学生吸烟状况及行为干预措施研究[J].预防医学情报杂志,1997,13(4):208-212. 被引量:13
  • 6WHO.Guidelines for the conduct of tobacco smoking surveys of the general population report.Helsink,Geneva,WHO,1982.
  • 7杨廷忠,阮哈建,李甫中.结构方程模型方法在流行病学研究中的应用[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(4):297-300. 被引量:31
  • 8Peter M,Bentler EQS.Structural Equations Program Manual.Los Angeles:Multivariate Software Inc,1995.45-48,85-86.
  • 9Green WL,Kreuter WM.Health promotion planning:An education and enviroment approach (second edition).Mountain View:Mayfield Publishing Company,1991.154-161.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables Toronto:John Wiley & Sons, 1989.318-403.
  • 2Cliff N. Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1983,18 : 115-126.
  • 3Wall MM, Li R. Comparison of multiple regression to two latent variable techniques for estimation and prediction. Stat Med, 2003,22:3671-3685.
  • 4Mcdonald RP, Ho M-HR. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods,2002,7:64-82.
  • 5West SG, Finch JF, Curran PJ. Structural equation models with non-normal variable. In: Hoyle GH, ed. Structural equation modeling:Concepts issues and application. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 1995.56-75.
  • 6Chou CP, Benter P. Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In : Hoyle GH, ed. Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues and application. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 1995. 167-244.
  • 7Satorra A, Bentler PM. Corrections totest statistic and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In: VonEye A, Clogg CC.eds. Analysis of latent variable in developmental research. Newbury Park:Sage, 1994. 399-419.
  • 8SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT users guide. Cary, NC: Author,1998. 370-432.
  • 9Muthen BO. A general structural equation model with dichotomous,ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators.Psychometrika, 1984,49 : 115-132.
  • 10Willet JB, Sayer AG. Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time.Psychological Bulletin, 1994,116:363-381.

共引文献42

同被引文献98

引证文献14

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部