期刊文献+

话语分析的哲学基础——建构主义认识论 被引量:48

The Philosophical Foundation of Discourse Analysis:Constructivist Epistemology
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前,话语分析缺乏明确的奋斗目标、独立的理论体系和系统的研究方法。作者认为,造成这一现状的主要原因之一是话语分析研究者对话语分析的哲学基础没有明确的认识。本文阐述话语分析的哲学基础———建构主义认识论,在此基础上论述以建构主义认识论为基础的话语分析的主要任务、理论框架和研究方法。 At present, discourse analysis lacks clear goal, an independent theoretical system or any systematic research methodology. The present author holds that one of the main reasons is that the researchers of discourse analysis don't have a clear understanding of the philosophical foundation of discourse analysis. This paper elaborates on constructivist epistemology as the philosophical foundation of discourse analysis and the main tasks, theoretical framework and the research methodology of discourse analysis based on constructivist epistemology.
作者 詹全旺
机构地区 安徽大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期14-19,共6页 Foreign Language Research
关键词 建构主义认识论 社会建构主义认识观 话语分析 现实 constructivist epistemology social constructivist view discourse analysis reality
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Berger, P. L., & T. Luckman. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology d Knowledge[M]. Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1967.
  • 2Brown, C., & C. Yule. Discourse Analysis[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 3Cook, G. Discourse and Literature[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • 4Cook, G. Discourse[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  • 5Coulthard, R. M. Introduction to Discourse Analysis[M]. London: Longman, 1985.
  • 6Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. Critical discourse analysis[A]. T. A. van Dijk. Discourse As Social Interaction: Volume Ⅰ[C]. London: Sage, 1997: 258-284.
  • 7Gee, J. P. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method[M]. London: Routledge, 1999.
  • 8Geertz, C. The Interpretation of Cultures[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
  • 9Gergen, K. An Invitation to Social Construction[M]. London: Sage, 1999.
  • 10Givon, T. On Understanding Grammar[M]. New York: Acdemic Press, 1979.

二级参考文献21

  • 1朱永生.功能语言学对文体分析的贡献[J].外语与外语教学,2001(5):1-4. 被引量:40
  • 2李红儒.从逻辑、哲学角度看句义理论的发展——“语句中的说话人因素”理论探讨之一[J].外语学刊,2001(1):31-38. 被引量:38
  • 3Alexander H.G. Meaning in language[M]. Florida: Scott, Foresman and company, 1969.
  • 4Grice H. P. Meaning[J]. The philosophical review, 1957(3).
  • 5Grice H. P. Utterer's meaning, sentence- meaning and word- meaning[J]. Foundations of language,1968(4).
  • 6Grice H. P. Utterer's meaning and intention[J]. The philosophical review, 1969(3).
  • 7Grice H. P. Studies in the way of words[M]. Cambridge, London: Harvard press,1989.
  • 8Lakoff G. & Johnson M. Metaphors we live by[M]. Chicago and London: The university of Chicago Press,1980.
  • 9Searle J. R., Kiefer F. & Bierwisch M. Speech act theory and pragmatics[C]. Dordrecht(Holland): D. Reidel publishing company,1980.
  • 10Wunderlich D. Foundations of linguistics[M]. Cambridge: CUP, 1979.

共引文献468

同被引文献456

引证文献48

二级引证文献285

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部