摘要
目的观察口臭仪与闻诊的临床应用效果,探讨口臭检测的最佳方法。方法将125例主诉口臭就医者,分别采用传统闻诊和口臭仪两种方法检测口臭,然后观察两者口臭检出率和操作方法的优劣。结果口臭检出率:口臭仪67.2%,闻诊71.2%,经2χ检验,2χ=1.18,P>0.05,无显著性差异;被检者对操作方法满意度调查:口臭仪95.2%,闻诊43.2%,经2χ检验,2χ=78.18,P<0.05,有显著性差异。结论口臭仪在口臭的检出率上稍有不足而在操作方法上却有较大的优势。认为将传统闻诊的方法改良为首选口臭仪检测口臭,部分阴性者(约4%)再通过闻诊确认,便可弥补两者的不足,是更行之有效的检测方法,值得临床应用和推广。
Objective To observe the clinical application and nursing of the halitosis equipment Halimeter and diagnosis by smelling, and discuss the best methods of detecting halitosis. Methods One hundred and twenty-five cases with halitosis were detected by the halitosis equipment Halimeter and traditional diagnosis method by smelling,and then observe halitosis detecting-rate and well or bad in operation methods. Results Detecting-rate by Halimeter were 67.2% and 71.2% by smelling, there was no difference between two methods (X^2=1.18, P〉0.05). The satisfactory rates with Halimeter by the patients are 95.2% and 43.2% with diagnosis by smelling, which showed significant difference between two methods (X^2=78.18, P〈0.05). Conclusion Halimeter has a bit insufficiency in detecting-rate but more advantage in detecting methods. If turning traditional diagnosis method by smelling into choosing the halitosis equipment Halimeter in advance, and partly negative patients (about 4%) being detected by smelling again, this can make up insufficiencies themselves, it is more effective and is worth of clinical application and popularize.
出处
《护理学报》
2006年第3期36-37,共2页
Journal of Nursing(China)
关键词
口臭
口臭仪
闻诊
挥发性硫化物
护理
halitosis
Halimeter
diagnosis by smelling
volatile sulphur compounds
nursing