论楚辞不学《诗经》

ON CHU CI NOT LEARNING FROM THE BOOK OF SONGS

历来治《骚》者都认为楚辞学习《诗经》,这一看法并不符合历史事实。20世纪考古成果已对北方文化中心论提出挑战,事实上楚文化早在春秋中叶就形成了自己的风格特色;屈原创作《离骚》并不是讽谏楚王,因此不能用《诗经》的美刺讽谏理论解说《离骚》;《离骚》列举了一些北方历史文化中的圣君贤臣,这是楚人以天下主人自居的博大气魄的体现;《离骚》的比兴来源于南楚巫文化艺术和战国士文化,“《离骚》之文,依《诗》取兴”说不能成立;最重要的是,楚辞与《诗经》分别出于两种不同的文化母体,楚辞不是《诗经》的继承,《诗》、《骚》两者是平行的关系。

For many years, researchers of Shao had thought that Chu Ci learned from the Book of Songs. This view is not believable. The archaeological achievements in 20C have challenged the thought of north culture centre. In fact, Chu culture came into its own features in the middle of the period of Chun and Qiu. Qu Yuan wrote Li Shao not for satirizing the king of Chu, So we can＇t interprate the Book of Songs with the theory of satire. Li Shao gives some examples of many clever emperors, which shows a great boldness that people in Chu state considered themselves as masters in the world. The cultural background of Li Shao originated from the witch culture of south Chu and bachelor culture of the warring state, So we can＇t say Li Shao learned from the Book of Songs. The most important thing is Chu Ci and the Book of Songs coming fi＇om different culture. Chu Ci is not an inheritance of the Book of Songs.