摘要
中外刑法中有“立法定性、司法定量”和“立法既定性又定量”两种犯罪定量模式,两者各有利弊。但传统的法文化与现实法体系的冲突注定了在我国刑法典中对犯罪进行“立法定量”的合理性和现实性。只有将“立法定量”与“司法定量”协调统一起来,犯罪定量才会得以实现。
The essay probe into the idea and the mode of the ration of crime, analyzes China and foreign countries different crime quantitative modes, namely the foreign ones "legislation determines the nature, judicature fixes quantity "mode and our country "legislation determines the nature and quantity" mode, compares advantages and disadvantages of the two ration, and concludes the basic reasons of difference is the conflict in traditional law culture and realistic law systems, it destines the rationality and reality of "legislative ration" to the crime in our criminal law. The deviation question of the measurement of penalty exists generally in the judicial practice.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期44-46,54,共4页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
犯罪定量
刑法模式
选择
the ration of crime
the mode of criminal law
choice