期刊文献+

基金风险调整收益的持续性检验 被引量:9

下载PDF
导出
摘要 一直以来,国内基金业绩持续性检验均利用季度数据和毛收益的方法进行实证。本文力图利用半年期数据和风险调整收益,用列联表(Contigencytable)分析、卡方独立性检验、交叉积率(CPR)及Z检验和风险调整收益的最小二乘(OLS)回归等实证方法对基金风险调整收益进行持续性检验,并进行业绩波动性的分组检验。结果发现基金风险调整收益的业绩持续性表现较差。
作者 刘建和
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2006年第3期183-185,共3页 Enterprise Economy
基金 浙江省教育厅科研项目资助 项目编号为:20051531
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1[1]Allen, Tan(1999), A Test of the Persistence in the Performance of U.K. Managed Funds, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 26(5)&(6)(June/July), pp559~ 593.
  • 2[2]Bing Liang(1999), On the Performance of Hedge Funds, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 55, No.4,pp.72~ 84.
  • 3[3]Black, A., P. Fraser, D.Power(1992), U.K. Unit Trust Performance 1980~ 1989: A Passive Time-Varying Approach, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 16, pp. 1015~ 1036.
  • 4[4]Brown, S.J, W.N. Goetzmann., R.G. Ibbotson., A.S. Ross(1992), Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 553~ 580.
  • 5[5]Gurney, J.P.(1976), Rank Correlation of Unit Trust Portfolio: 1971 to 1975, Investment Analyst, No.46,pp. 28~ 30.
  • 6[6]Jensen, M.C.(1968), Problems in Selection of Security Portfolios-The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945~ 1964, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 23, pp.389~ 416.
  • 7[7]Louis Cheng, Lynn Pi, Don Wort(1999), Are There Hot Hands Among Mutual Fund Houses in Hong Kong, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 26(1)&(2)(January/March), pp103~135.
  • 8[1]Carlson R S. Aggregate performance of mutual funds[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1970,5:1~32.
  • 9[2]Elton E J, Martin J G. Modern portfolio theory and investment management[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
  • 10[3]Lehmann B N,David M. Mutual fund performance evaluation:a comparison of benchmarks and a benchmark of comparisons[J]. Journal of finance, 1987,21: 233~ 265.

共引文献59

同被引文献47

引证文献9

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部