期刊文献+

概念隐喻和语篇连贯 被引量:70

Conceptual metaphor and discourse coherence
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从认知的角度,根据Lakoff和Langacker的理论,分析了Robert Penn Warren的叙事语篇All the King s Men。语篇在叙事结构的框架内展开,一方面陈述人物经验,为隐喻提供经验基础;另一方面,通过对twitch的隐喻化完成对经验的概念化和诠释,结果是跨领域的概念映射———概念隐喻。隐喻是统驭语篇的因素,保证了语篇的连贯,而语篇则体现了概念隐喻。 This paper is an analysis of the narrative discourse All the King's Men from a cognitive approach, centering round a conceptual metaphor, using theories advanced by Lakoff and Langacker. The text is found to unfold within the framework of narrative structure, presenting the life of the characters, thus providing the experiential basis for the metaphor, and, meanwhile, proceeding with the conceptualization and construal of the experience by means of the metaphorization of the metaphoric expression “twitch”. The result is a conceptual mapping across the domains — a conceptual metaphor: Life Is A Twitch. The metaphor serves as the unifying factor in the text, which ensures the coherence of the discourse, and the text, in its turn, represents the realization of the metaphor.
作者 任绍曾
机构地区 浙江大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第2期91-100,共10页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Halliday,M.A.K.& C.M.Matthissen,1999.Construing Experience through Meaning:A Languagebased Approach to Cognition[M].London and NewYork:Continuum.
  • 2Halliday,M.A.K.& C.M.Matthissen,2004.An Introduction to Functional Grammar,Third Edition[M].London:Arnold.
  • 3Koller,V.2003.Metaphor clusters,metaphor chains:Analyzing the multifunctionality of metaphor in text[J].Metaphorik de 5/:115-134.
  • 4Lakoff,G.1993.The contemporary theory of metaphor[A].In Ortony (ed.).Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.)[C].Cambridge:CUP.
  • 5George Lakoff.Cognitive Linguistics:What It Means and Where It Is Going[J].外国语,2005,28(2):2-22. 被引量:20
  • 6Lakoff,G.& M.Johnson.1980.Metaphor We Live By[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Langacker,R.W.1987.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar,Vol.Ⅰ[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  • 8Langacker,R.W.1987 Nouns and verbs[J].Language.63/1:53-94.
  • 9Langacker,R.W.1991.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar.Vol.Ⅱ[M].Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  • 10Langacker,R.W.1991.Cognitive grammar[A].In F.G.Droste.& J.E.Joseph (eds.).Linguistic theory and grammatical description[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins Company.

二级参考文献37

  • 1任绍曾.语篇中语言型式化的意义——探索语篇主题的一种途径[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(2):110-116. 被引量:25
  • 2Barlow, Michael. A Situated Theory of Agreement [M]. New York: Garland, 1992.
  • 3Chafe, Wallace. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing [M]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  • 4Fauconnier, Gilles. Mental Spaces." Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language [M]. Cambridge,MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford, 1985.
  • 5Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Minds Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  • 6Gensler, Orin D. Non-Syntactic Antecedents and Frame Semantics[A]. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistics Society[Z]. 1977, 3:321-334.
  • 7Haiman, John. Dictionaries and Encyclopedias [J]. Lingua, 1980, 50: 329-357.
  • 8Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, 7: 391-428.
  • 9Kovecses, Zoltan, and Gtinter Radden. Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View. Cognitive Linguistics, 1998, 9: 33-77.
  • 10Kumashiro, Toshiyuki, and Ronald W. Langacker. Double-Subject and Complex-Predicate Constructions [J].Cognitive Linguistics, 2003,14:1-45.

共引文献275

同被引文献572

引证文献70

二级引证文献329

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部