期刊文献+

胸腹水细胞学与组织学制片的免疫细胞化学诊断对比研究 被引量:6

Contrasting study of immunocytochemical diagnosis between cytology and histopathology of pleural and peritoneal effusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨脱落细胞学与组织病理学制片在胸腹水恶性细胞诊断中的敏感性。方法103例患者胸腹水标本经特殊处理后,分别做细胞学涂片和石蜡包埋制片,并采用免疫细胞化学(ICC)方法,用肿瘤相关糖蛋白72和癌胚抗原组合、神经特异性钙结合蛋白和血栓素组合进行诊断,比较其阳性检出率。结果石蜡包埋制片肿瘤相关糖蛋白72和癌胚抗原组合、神经特异性钙结合蛋白和血栓素组合分别诊断转移腺癌阳性率97.9%、恶性间皮瘤阳性率100%;应用相应抗体组合,细胞学涂片的阳性率分别为95.8%,100%。两者阳性率比较无显著性差异(x2=0.17,P>0.05)。结论通过对胸、腹水标本和材料的前期有效处理后,细胞学涂片的免疫细胞化学诊断转移性腺癌、恶性间皮瘤的敏感性与组织学方法具有较高的一致性。 Objective To study the diagnostic sensitivity between exfoliative cytology and histopathology of pleural and peritoneal effusion. Methods 103 samples of pleural and peritoneal effusion were prepared by paraffin imbedding and cytological smear respectively. Malignant tumor cells were identified with the combinatorial antibodies of cancerrelated glycoprotein 72 and CEA, nerve-specificity calcium binding protein and thrombexan. Results The positive rate prepared by paraffin imbedding was 97.9% with cancerrelated glycoprotein 72 and CEA, and with 100% of nerve-specificity calcium binding protein and thromboxan. The positive ratios prepared by cytological smear were 95.8% and 100% with the correspondence immunoeytochemistry above. There was no significantly different between the two methods(x^2=0.17,P〉0.05). Conclusions The diagnostic sensitivity of cytological smear combined the antibodies, through handling the samples from pleural and peritoneal effusions, is of similarity comparing with that of paraffin imbedding.
出处 《江西医学检验》 2006年第1期17-18,38,共3页 Jiangxi Journal of Medical Laboratory Sciences
基金 广西百色市科学研究与技术开发计划项目基金资助(200405)
关键词 胸腹水 细胞学诊断 免疫组织化学 Pleural and peritoneal effusions Cytodiagnosis Immunocytochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献13

  • 1DeMay RM. The Art & Science of Cytopathology [M]. Chicago:ASCP Press, 1995:263-264.
  • 2Ordonez NG. The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma:differentiation of mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 1989, 13(4): 276-291.
  • 3Kho-Duffin J, Tao LC, Cramer H, et al. Cytologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, with particular emphasis on the epithelial noncohesive cell type [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 1999, 20(2): 57-62.
  • 4Fetsch PA, Abati A. lmmunocytochemistry in effusion cytology[J]. Cytopathology, 2001, 93 (5): 293-308.
  • 5Behrens J. Cell contacts, differentiation, and invasiveness of epithelial cells [J]. Invasion Metastasis, 1994-95, 14 (1-6):61-70.
  • 6Schofield K, D'Aquila T, Rimm DL. The cell adhesion molecule,E-cadherin, distinguishes mesothelial cells from carcinoma cells in fluids [J]. Cancer, 1997, 81 (5): 293-298.
  • 7Schofield K, D'Aquila T, Rimm DL. E-cadherin expression is a sensitive and specific method for detection of carcinoma cells in fluid specimens [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2000, 22(5): 263-267.
  • 8Barberis MC, Faleri M, Veronese S, et al. Calretinin. A selective marker of normal and neoplastic mesothelial cells in serous effusions [J]. Acta Cytol, 1997, 41 (6): 1757-1761.
  • 9Chhieng DC, Yee H, Schaefer D, et al. Calretinin staining pattern aids in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions [J]. Cancer, 2000, 90 (3): 194-200.
  • 10Ordonez lN. Value of calretinin immunostaining in differentiating epithelial mesothelioma from lung adenocarcinoma [J]. Mod Pathol, 1998, 11 (10): 929-933.

共引文献37

同被引文献39

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部