期刊文献+

刍议跨国公司转移价格及其影响 被引量:4

On the Transfer Price of Multinational Enterprises and Negative Influences in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在当前各个国家税率差别减小,加强监管的背景下,跨国公司在我国使用转移价格主要基于非税务动因。出于整体利润最大化以及战略拓展的需要,跨国公司的转移价格定价方法主要有两大类:基于利润的方法和基于市场竞争的方法。跨国公司使用转移价格对我国企业、产业以及财政收入等方面都产生了严重的不良影响,需要在积极引进外资的同时,不断完善相关法律规定,加强国际税收合作,提高外资质量。 Non-tax motivation is the main purpose of the multinational enterprises using transfer price in China. To get the maximum profits and fulfill the overall strategies, the methods of transfer pricing includes the ways based on profits and those based on commercial competition. And the using of transfer price causes many negative effects to the enterprises, industries, and financial incomes of our country. Due to these problems, our country should do more on legislation relating to transfer price, intensify worldwide cooperation in the field of international taxation, and improve the quality of foreign capital by more strict supervision.
机构地区 中国海洋大学
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第6期8-12,共5页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
关键词 转移价格 动因 定价方法 负面影响 transfer price motivation transfer pricing methods negative effects
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献7

  • 1[1]Copithorne L W. International corporate transfer prices and government policy[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1971, (4): 324-342.
  • 2[2]Kant C. Foreign subsidiary, transfer pricing and tariff[J]. Southern Economic Journal, 1988, (55): 147-157.
  • 3[3]Sinn H W, Weichenrieder A. Foreign direct investment, political resentment and the privatization process in Eastern Europe[J]. Economic Policy, 1997, (24): 179-210.
  • 4[4]Svejnar J, Smith S C. The economics of joint ventures in less developed countries[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984, (99): 149-167.
  • 5[5]Al-Saadon Y, Das S P. Host-country policy, transfer pricing and ownership distribution in international joint ventures: a theoretical analysis[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1996, (14): 345-364.
  • 6[6]Konrad K, Lommerud K E. Foreign direct investment, intra-firm trade and ownership structure[J]. European Economic Review, 1999, (4): 335-367.
  • 7[7]Tommy S G, Guttorm S. Transfer pricing and ownership structure[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1999, 101(4): 673-688.

共引文献52

同被引文献13

  • 1李雅菁.美国两次金融危机对中国的启示[J].新金融,2008(12):21-25. 被引量:2
  • 2王雷.基于跨国公司视角的产业集群理论研究综述[J].南开经济研究,2004(5):105-108. 被引量:20
  • 3Anctil,R.,S.Dutta. Transfer Pricing, Decision Rights and Divisional versus Finn-wide Performance Evaluation. The Accounting Review [J].1999,74 ( 1 ):87-104.
  • 4Sansing, R. Relationship-Specific Investments and the Transfer Pricing Paradox[J]. Review of Accounting Studies, 1999, (4) : 119-134.
  • 5Haufer, A., G. Schjeldenlp. Corporate Tax Systems and Cross Country Profit Shifting[J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 2000, (52) :306-325.
  • 6Smith, M. Ex ante and Ex post Discretion Over Arm's Length Transfer Prices[J]. The Accounting Review, 2002, (77) : 161-184.
  • 7Elitzur and Mintz.Transfer Pricing Rules and Corporate Tax Competition [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 1996, ( 60 ) : 401-422.
  • 8Baldenius, T., N. Melumad, and S. Reichelstein. Integrating Managerial and Tax Objectives in Transfer Pricing [J].Working Paper, Columbia University, 2002.
  • 9Smith,M. Tax and Incentive Trade-offs in Multinational Transfer Pricing [J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing& Finance, 2002,17(2) :209-236.
  • 10Vaysman, I..A Model of Negotiated Transfer Pricing[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics. 1998, (251 ) : 349-384.

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部