期刊文献+

对“关爱”意义的探究 被引量:4

Exploration into the Meaning of Care
原文传递
导出
摘要 教育者们面临着挑战:丰富一种教学的道德词汇内涵,使它敏感于活生生的、经验过的教学关系。本文通过对“关爱”意义的简略探究,给出了一个现象学困惑,它涉及到专业的“关爱”概念和日常“关爱”体验之间的关系。专业的“关爱”概念常常忽略其敏感而微妙之处,但对许多父母和教师而言,“关爱”被体验为忧虑和责任,而这种忧虑常会由于自身的幸福感受被忽略。面对这一困惑,作者围绕“当道德语言变成专业的理论词汇、意义变得模糊或被消解之后会发生什么”的问题展开讨论。 Educators are challenged to develop a moral vocabulary of teaching and this language needs to be sensitive to the way that pedagogical relations are lived and experienced. This brief exploration into the meaning of care offers a phenomenological puzzle. It concerns the relation between professionally received meanings of the ethical concept of care and the lived experience of caring. The language of care tends to pass over more subtle and deeply felt sensibilities. It seems that for many parents and teachers caring commonly means worrying--or better caring is experienced as worrying responsibility. But this worry is often passed over in favor of happier or more acceptable categories. Relevant questions are raised and discussed in the paper.
出处 《中国德育》 2006年第1期20-24,67,共6页 Moral Education China
关键词 关爱 道德语言 忧虑 care, language of care, caring-worrying
  • 相关文献

同被引文献17

  • 1孙玉红.关爱教育研究综述[J].兰州学刊,2009(S1):203-205. 被引量:8
  • 2石中英,余清臣.关怀教育:超越与界限——诺丁斯关怀教育理论述评[J].教育研究与实验,2005(4):28-31. 被引量:67
  • 3[巴]弗莱雷.被压迫者教育学[M].顾建新,等译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001:39.
  • 4[美]杜威.道德教育原理[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,2003.
  • 5[美]埃利希·弗洛姆.爱的艺术[M].李健鸣译.北京:商务印书馆,1987.
  • 6Van Manen,Max.Moral Language and Pedagogical Experiece[].The Journal of Curriculum Studies.2000
  • 7Van Manen,Max.Care-as-Worry,or"Don‘t Worry Be Happy"[].Qualitateve Health Research.2000
  • 8[美]JanetGonzalez-Mena.儿童、家庭和社区--家庭中心的早期教育(第5版)[M].郑福明,冯夏婷,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2012:113.
  • 9Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Emile[M].London: Dent &Sons Ltd.,1955:43.
  • 10Noddings. The Challenge to Care in Sehools[M].New York: Teachers College Press, 1992:32,23.

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部