期刊文献+

罗哌卡因感觉神经分离阻滞分娩镇痛的临床研究 被引量:3

Clinic Study on Separating Blockage of Sensory Nerve with Ropivacaine During Labor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨罗哌卡因于蛛网膜下腔阻滞感觉神经中痛觉神经纤维、保留触觉的可行性及有效剂量计量单位。方法选择ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级足月单胎初产妇60例,随机分成Ⅰ组、Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组,每组20例。宫口开3 cm时分别于蛛网膜下腔注入罗哌卡因Ⅰ组2 mg、Ⅱ组2.5 mg、Ⅲ组3 mg;容积均为2.5 ml。观察项目:起效时间、阻滞平面、维持时间、VAS评分、触觉评分、运动阻滞评分、产妇血压、心率、宫缩及胎心。结果Ⅱ、Ⅲ组镇痛效果及维持时间明显优于Ⅰ组(P<0.05);Ⅰ、Ⅱ组运动神经、触觉神经阻滞评分低,与Ⅲ组有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论蛛网膜下腔注射罗哌卡因2.5mg能够产生感觉神经中痛觉、触觉神经分离阻滞,镇痛效果良好。 Objective To investigate the availability of the separating blockage ot sentry nerve with ropivacaine during labor. Methods Sixty cases of ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ full term primiparae were randomly divided into 3 groups ( n = 20) : group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ were administered respectively with Ropivacaine (2.5ml) 2mg,2.5mg and 3mg by subarachnoid space when the uterine orifice dilated to 3cm. The level and time of analgesia , levels of algaesthesis (VAS scores), degree of tactile sensation, motor blockage, the blood pressure, heart rate, uterine contraction and fetal heart rate of parturients were recorded andcompared during the parturition. Results The level of algaesthesis and time of analgesia in group Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significant differences than that in group Ⅰ(P〈 0.05); The degree of tactile sensation and motor blockage in group Ⅰ and Ⅱ were significantly lower than that in group Ⅲ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusions 2.5mg ropivacaine a ministered by subarachnoid is effective in .separating blockage of sensory nerve and analgesia with negligible side- effect during labor.
出处 《实用全科医学》 2006年第2期134-135,共2页 Applied Journal Of General Practice
关键词 罗哌卡因 感觉神经 阻滞 产科 镇痛 Ropivacaine Sentry nerve, Blockage Obstetric Analgesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

共引文献260

同被引文献18

  • 1曲元,吴新民.分娩镇痛新进展[J].中国生育健康杂志,2004,15(4):251-253. 被引量:9
  • 2刘继云,佘守章,邬子林,韩光炜,杨美英,邓玲红.产妇鞘内注射舒芬太尼分娩镇痛的效应[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(10):768-770. 被引量:77
  • 3张玉洁,吴燕云,刘继云,邓玲红,王冬昱,陆佩华,顾正田,康佳丽.可行走分娩镇痛应用于潜伏期的临床研究[J].中国医师进修杂志,2006,29(11):24-26. 被引量:11
  • 4徐建国,吴新民,罗爱伦,等.成人手术后疼痛处理专家共识.中华医学会麻醉学分会,2009:14-15.
  • 5Hollmann MW, Durieux ME. Local Anesthetics and the Inflammatory Response:A New Therapeutic Indication? [J]. Anesthesiology,2000, 93(3) :858-875.
  • 6Parker M J, Unwin SC, Handoll HH, et al. General versus spinal/epi- dural anaesthesia for surgery for hip fractures in adults [ J ]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2000,4:202-209.
  • 7Borghi B, Laici C, Luorio S, et al. Epidural vs general anaesthesia[ J]. Minerva Anestesio1,2002,68 (4) : 171-177.
  • 8Carli F,Mayo N,Klubien K,et al. Epidural Anelgesia Enhances Func- tional Exercise Capacity and Health-related Quality of Life after Colon- ic Surgery : Results of a Randomized Trial [ J ]. Anasthesiology, 2002, 97 (3) :540649.
  • 9Fong HK, Sands LP, Leung JM. The role of posroperative analgesia in delirium and cognitive decline in elderly patients: a systematic review [ J]. Anesth Analg,2006,102 : 1255-1266.
  • 10Flisberg P, Tornebrandt K, Walther B, et al. Pain relief after esoph- agectomy:Thoracic epidural analgesia is better than parenteral opi- oids [ J ]. J C ardiothorac Vasc Anesth ,2001,15 ( 3 ) :282-287.

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部