期刊文献+

人误原因因素灰色关联分析 被引量:25

Grey Relativity Analysis of Human Error Causal Factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 主要探讨人误原因因素对人误的影响主、次问题.根据建立的人误原因因素层次架构,运用灰色系统理论中的关联分析方法,结合某组织近几年发生的人因事件及根原因分析方法,定量分析计算得到:影响人误的主因素次序为组织、个人、技术和环境因素;影响人误的主要子因素为管理控制因素,其次为素质因素等.同时,分析了同一主因素下的子因素对其主因素的关联情况以及同一层次因素之间的关联情况. The paper mainly discusses the sequence of casual factors which impacts upon human errors. According to hierarchical framework of human error causal factors, relativity analysis method in grey systems theory, human factor events in certain organization and Root Cause Analysis, the results by quantitative calculation are obtained as following: the order of main factors causing human error is organizational factor, personal factor, technical factor and environmental factor. The most important one among various sub-factors contributing to human errors is managerial control factor, and the second one is the quality factor and so on. The various relativity among sub-factors under the same main factors and the relativity among factors in the same layer are analyzed simultaneously.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第3期131-134,140,共5页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(70271016) 国防科研项目(Z012002A001)
关键词 人误原因因素 灰色系统理论 关联分析 human error causal factors grey systems theory relativity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Woodcock K,Drury C G,Smiley A,et al.Using simulated investigations for accident investigation studies[J].Applied Ergonomics,2005(36):1-12.
  • 2Hollnagel E.Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method[M].Oxford(UK):Elsevier Science Ltd,1998.
  • 3Kubota R,Kiyokawa K,Arazoe M,et al.Analysis of organisation-committed human error by extended CREAM[J].Cognition,Technology&Work,2001 (3):67-81.
  • 4李鹏程,王以群,张力.人误模式与原因因素分析[J].工业工程与管理,2006,11(1):94-99. 被引量:24
  • 5傅立.灰色理论及其应用[M].北京:北京科学技术出版社,1992..

二级参考文献5

  • 1Reason J. Human error[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 2Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method[M]. Ordord(UK) : Elsevier Science Ltd. , 1998.
  • 3Wiegmann A, Rantanen E. Defining the Relationship Between Human Error Classes and Technology Intervention Strategies[R]. ARL-2-1/NASA-02-1, Hampton: NASA Langley Research Center, 2002.
  • 4Kubota R, Kiyokawa K, Arazoe M, et al. Analysis of Organization-Committed Human Error by Extended CREAM[J]. Cognition, Technology&Work ,2001(3) :67-81.
  • 5张力,王以群,黄曙东.人因事故纵深防御系统模型[J].中国安全科学学报,2002,12(1):34-37. 被引量:42

共引文献27

同被引文献200

引证文献25

二级引证文献226

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部